Integration of explicit vocabulary instruction in teaching Science

  • Ariel Venida Bical High School, PHILIPPINES
Keywords: 5 E’s learning cycle, Frayer model, inquiry-based teaching, reading comprehension, science performance, vocabulary instruction, wordlist

Abstract

Reading comprehension is an essential interdisciplinary skill that serves as a foundation of all other subject areas. In science, as a subject rich in vocabulary words, the learner's ability to read and comprehend to generate a conceptual understanding cannot be set aside. Thus, integrating literacy strategies such as vocabulary instruction strategies in teaching the subject is of great help to the learners. This quasi-experimental research determined the effect of integrating explicit vocabulary instruction strategy in the conceptual understanding of students in science. Forty-four students served as participants in this research. Inquiry-based approach, particularly the Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate Learning Cycle (5 E’s) was utilized in teaching the control group. While in the experimental group, the same strategy was employed, but with the integration of vocabulary instruction strategies. T-test was used in determining the significant difference in the performances of the two groups. The findings reveal that the students who were taught with the integration of explicit vocabulary instruction strategy performed better than the students who did not undergo vocabulary instruction. This suggests that the integration of the explicit vocabulary instruction strategy in teaching science enhances the conceptual understanding of the students in the subject. Thus, it is recommended that science teachers who are trained as content specialists should consider integrating explicit vocabulary instruction strategies in teaching to address the literacy needs of the students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37-41. doi:10.13189/ujer.2014.020104

Akbaşlı, S., Şahin, M., & Yaykiran, Z. (2016). The effect of reading comprehension on the performance in science and mathematics. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(16), 108-121. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1108657

Alashry, S. A. A., Qoura, A. A., & Gohar, R. H. A. (2018). The impact of Frayer model and contextual redefinition strategy on improving preparatory stage pupils' vocabulary learning. Journal of Research in Curriculum, Instruction and Educational Technology, 4(4), 11-36. Retrieved from https://jrciet.journals.ekb.eg/article_31954_214dbc77c2c4f69523e12815eebed3b5.pdf

Ayodele, M. O. (2017). Influence of vocabulary development on reading comprehension of secondary school students in science. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(3), 81-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.506

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G. & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction. Guilford Press.

Bilbao, M. E. M., Donguila, C. L. S., & Vasay, M. J. G. (2016). Level of reading comprehension of the education students. International Journal of Liberal Arts, Education, Social Sciences, and Philosophical Studies, 4(1), 343-353. Retrieved from https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=13762

Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strategy instruction or daily use of strategies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32, 2281-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09951-w

Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS instructional model: Personal reflection and contemporary implications. Retrieved from https://newscenter.sdsu.edu/education/projectcore/files/05329-5E_instructional_Model_R_Bybee.pdf

Cabasan, H. C. (2011). The reading comprehension levels of freshman education students: A reading program design. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 4(18), 357–363. Retrieved from http://www.openaccesslibrary.org/images/0418_Haydee_C._Cabasan.pdf

Cervetti, G. N., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & McClung, N. A. (2015). Factors that influence the difficulty of science words. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(2), 153-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X15615363

City of San Fernando Pampanga-City Information Office. (2019). City of San Fernando ranks 1 in the 2018 national achievement test out of 20 divisions in central Luzon. Retrieved from https://m.facebook.com/CSFP.CIO/photos/a.1187992694717681/1187992778051006/?type=3

Chola, J., & Shumba, O. (2016). Impact of the BSCS 5e model on Zambian grade 11 learners’ comprehension and attitudes on acid-base concepts in chemistry 5070. Eurasian Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 8(1), 25-35. https://ijpce.org/index.php/IJPCE/article/view/34

Cohen, M. T. (2012). Strengthening science vocabulary through the use imagery interventions with college students. Creative Education, 3(7), 1251-1258. 10.4236/ce.2012.37184

Coşgun, G. (2016). The impact of using wordlists in the language classroom on students’ vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(3), 49-66. Retrieved from https://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Impact-of-Using-Wordlists-in-the-Language-Classroom-on-Students----Vocabulary-Acquisition.pdf

Geng, X. (2020). Psychological mechanism of English learners in reading comprehension. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 29(2), 807-813. doi: 10.24205/03276716.2020.314

Imam, O. A., Abas-Mastura, M., Jamil H., & Ismail, Z. (2014). Reading comprehension skills and performance in science among high school students in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 29, 81-94. Retrieved from http://apjee.usm.my/APJEE_29_2014/Art%205(81-94).pdf

Kissau, S., & Hiller, F. (2013). Reading comprehension strategies: An international comparison of teacher preferences. Research in Comparative and International Education, 8(4), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2013.8.4.437

Flanigan, K. & Greenwood, S. C. (2007). Effective content vocabulary instruction in the middle: Matching students, purposes, words, and strategies. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51(3), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.3.3

Fenty, N. S., & Brydon, M. (2017). Integrating literacy and the content curriculum to support diverse learners. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(2), 225-238. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1160659.pdf

Gallagher, M. A., & Anderson, B. E. (2016). Get all jazzed up for vocabulary instruction: Strategies that engage. The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1498

Gillis, V. (2014). Talking the talk: Vocabulary instruction across the disciplines (or what to do “instead”). Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(4), 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.356

Jones, K. (2018). Using a concept of definition word map to teach science vocabulary. Journal of Teacher Action Research, 5(1), 36-56. Retrieved from http://www.practicalteacherresearch.com/uploads/5/6/2/4/56249715/using_a_concept_of_definition_word_map_to_teach_science_vocabulary.pdf

Kameli, S., & Baki, R. B. (2013). The impact of vocabulary knowledge level on EFL reading comprehension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(1), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2015.1006

Kimberlin, S., & Yezierski, E. (2016). Effectiveness of inquiry-based lessons using particulate level models to develop high school students’ understanding of conceptual stoichiometry. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 1002-1009. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b01010

Kibirige, I., Osodo, J., & Tlala, K. M. (2014). The effect of predict-observe-explain strategy on learners’ misconception about dissolved salts. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 300-310. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n4p300

Linyang, Y. (2021). An analysis of English reading comprehension from the perspective of psycholinguistics. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 523, 89-93. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210206.019

Madu, B. C., & Amaechi, C. C. (2012). Effect of five-step learning cycle model on students’ understanding of concepts related to elasticity. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(9), 173-181. Retrieved from https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/2418

Marchand-Martella, N. E., Martella, R. C., Modderman, S. L., Petersen, H., & Pan, S. (2013). Key areas of effective adolescent literacy programs. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 161-184.

Montebon, D. R. T. (2014). K12 science program in the Philippines: Student perception on its implementation. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 153-164. Retrieved from https://ijern.com/journal/2014/December-2014/15.pdf

Moody, S., Hu, X., Kuo, L., Jouhar, M., Xu, Z., & Lee, S. (2018). Vocabulary instruction: A critical analysis of theories, research, and practice. Education Sciences, 8(4), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040180

Moore, D. W. (n.d.). Why vocabulary instruction matters. Retrieved from http://ngl.cengage.com

Nyarko, K., Kugbey, N., Kofi, C. C., Cole, Y. A., & Adentwi, K. I. (2018). English reading proficiency and academic performance among lower primary school children in Ghana. SAGE Open. July 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018797019

PISA 2018 National Report of the Philippines (2019). Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/PISA-2018-Philippine National-Report.pdf.

Pittman, M. (2018). Action research: Using engaging vocabulary instruction in a science classroom. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/honorsprojects/324.

Rupley, W. H., Nichols, W. D., Mraz, M., & Blair, T. R. (2012). Building conceptual understanding through vocabulary instruction. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 51(4), 299-320. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3054&context=reading_horizons

Saygili, K. (2017). Effects of retrieval vocabulary instruction on academic reading comprehension. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 253-270. doi: 10.32601/ejal.461011

Sedita, J. (2005). Effective vocabulary instruction. Insights on Learning Disabilities, 2(1), 33-45. Retrieved from https://keystoliteracy.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/effective-vocabulary-instruction.pdf

Sen, S., & Oskay, O. O. (2017). The effects of 5E inquiry learning activities on achievement and attitude toward chemistry. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n1p1

Sidek, H. M., & Rahim, H. A. (2015). The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 50-56. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046

Stockton, W. M. (2016). The effects of explicit science vocabulary instruction on vocabulary acquisition on the flathead Indian reservation. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.montana.edu

Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, UK; Philadelphia, USA. Open University Press.

What Components Comprise High-quality Reading Instruction? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/rti03/creasource/q2/p02/

Zhao, X., & Zhu, L. (2012). Schema theory and college English reading teaching. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 11-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p111

Published
2021-08-03
How to Cite
Venida, A. (2021). Integration of explicit vocabulary instruction in teaching Science. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 11(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol11.2.1.2021