The Development of Circle Kit for Form 2 Circle Topic

Authors

  • Amirah Fatihah Mohd Zulkiflee Department of Mathematics, Faculty Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Norazman Arbin Department of Mathematics, Faculty Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Norsyazana Kamarudin Sekolah Menengah Puteri Titiwangsa, Jalan Temerloh, 53200 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Siti Noor Asyikin Mohd Razali Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 84600 Pagoh, Johor, Malaysia
  • Riyan Hidayat Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rezi Ariawan Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
  • Firdaus Mohamad Hamzah Centre of Defence Foundation Studies, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia, 57000 Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol13.1.4.2025

Keywords:

validity, usability, teaching aid, integer multiplication, form 2

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate the validity and usability of Circle Kit for the Form 2 Circles topic. The study employs the Design and Development Research (DDR) approach, focusing on the Analysis Phase and the Design and Development Phase guided by the ADDIE model. Five experts consisting of four Mathematics lecturers from a public university and one secondary school Mathematics teacher, assessed the kit’s validity. To determine usability, 35 Mathematics trainee teachers from Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) were selected through simple random sampling and responded to a usability questionnaire. Data from expert evaluation were analysed using descriptive analysis, employing the Content Validity Index (CVI), while usability was determined using the mean score. The results of the study found that the validity of the content of daily lesson plan (RPH), kit face and kit content is satisfactory with a value of CVI 1.00. The results also show that the kit’s usability scored a mean of 3.83, indicating high usability. In conclusion, the RPH aligns with the learning standards and supports the kit’s use during Teaching and Facilating (PdPc) sessions. The implication is that the developed kit effectively addresses the Circles topic, making it suitable as a teaching aid (BBM). This study provides valuable guidelines and innovative ideas for Form 2 Mathematics teachers to enhance their teaching through the application of this educational tool.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aliff Nawi, Gamal Abdul Nasir Zakaria, Norkhairiah Hashim & Chua Chy Ren. (2015). Penilaian Kualiti Modul iPBL: Aspek Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan. Jurnal Pengukuran Kualiti dan Analisis. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2011). Instructional design for teachers: Improving classroom practice. New York: Routledge.

Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (2012). Mathematics syllabus: Primary one to five. Singapore: Ministry of Education, Singapore.

Faizah Ja’apar. (2017). Bahan Bantu Mengajar (BBM) dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran (P&P) di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan (SMK) daerah Pontian. (Tesis Master). Diperoleh daripada http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/id/eprint /9573/1/FAIZAH_JA%E2%80%99APAR.pdf.

Foskett, G., & Blackhall, C. (2012). Singapore – “Teach Less, Learn More!” Diperoleh daripada https://3diassociates.wordpress.com/2012/07/21/singapore-teach-less-learn-more/

Hamidah Yusof, Jamal Yunus, & Khalip Musa. (2015). Kaedah penyelidikan: Pengurusan pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Juhazren Junaidi & Norezhar Aziz. (2010). Pembangunan Laman Web Bagi Matapelajaran Matematik Kbsm Tingkatan Empat Bertajuk Bulatan III. pp. 1-8.

Juppri Bacotang, Zainiah Mohamed Isa, Mazlina Che Mustafa, Mahzan Arshad, & Ainon Omar. (2016). Aplikasi Model ADDIE Dalam Pembangunan Modul Literasi Awal (MODUL LIT-A) Untuk Awal Kanak-Kanak. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Neilson J., (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Diperoleh daripada http://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan (Edisi Kedua). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: McGraw Hill Education.

Polit, E. D. & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29 (5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147.

Richey, R., & Klien, J.D. (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and Issues: Routledge.

Riduwan. (2012). Skala pengukuran variable-variable: Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Zuraidah Abdullah, & Junaidah M. Kasim, (2010). The Digital Library Usability Testing. Asia-Pacific Journal of Information Technology and Multimedia, 9(1).

Downloads

Published

2025-01-02

How to Cite

Mohd Zulkiflee, A. F., Arbin, N., Kamarudin, N., Mohd Razali, S. N. A., Hidayat, R., Ariawan, R., & Mohamad Hamzah, F. (2025). The Development of Circle Kit for Form 2 Circle Topic. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 13(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol13.1.4.2025