Pengaruh Amalan Pembelajaran Profesional terhadap Kepimpinan Guru-Guru Kolej Vokasional di Perak

The Influence of Professional Learning Practice on Leadership of Vocational College Teachers in Perak

  • Wan Ameera Farhah Wan Azahari Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
  • Mahaliza Mansor Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
Keywords: Teacher learning practices, teacher leadership, vocational colleges

Abstract

Kajian ini adalah bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti pengaruh amalan pembelajaran profesional terhadap kepimpinan guru kolej vokasional di negeri Perak. Seramai 278 orang guru dari 10 buah kolej vokasional di seluruh negeri Perak telah dipilih dengan menggunakan persampelan rawak mudah. Kajian ini adalah berbentuk kuantitatif dengan menggunakan soal selidik yang telah dibangunkan oleh Mahaliza (2013) dan Sickle (2011) bagi item-item amalan pembelajaran profesional manakala kepimpinan guru dibangunkan oleh Katzenmeyer dan Moller (2009). Analisis deskriptif iaitu min dan sisihan piawai serta inferensi sepertikorelasi pearson dan regreasi pelbagai telah digunakan untuk menjawab persoalan serta hipotesis kajian. Data yang diperoleh telah di analisis menggunakan perisian SPSS versi 20. Secara keseluruhannya, dapatan kajian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan (r=.51, p<.01) di antara amalan pembelajaran profesional dengan kepimpinan guru. Selain itu, dapatan kajian juga menunjukkan bahawa pembangunan portfolio (β = .36, t = 7.21,p<.05) merupakan peramal utama amalan pembalajaran profesional terhadap kepimpinan guru diikuti dengan latihan(β = .22, p<.05), pembelajaran arahan kendiri(β = .18, p<.05) dan lesson study(β = .11, t = 3.96 dan p<.05). Kesimpulannya, amalan pembelajaran professional iaitu portfolio, latihan, pembelajaran arahan kendiri dan lesson study mempengaruhi kepimpinan guru di kolej vokasional di negeri Perak.Implikasi kajian ini menunjukkan amalan pembelajaran professional dapat meningkatkan kepimpinan guru di kolej vokasional untuk pembangunan kerjaya mereka.

This study aims to identify the influence of professional learning practices on the leadership of vocational colleges in Perak. A total of 278 teachers from 10 vocational colleges throughout the state of Perak were selected using a simple random sampling. The is a quantitative study using the questionnaire developed by Mahaliza (2013) and Sickle (2011) for professional learning practice items while teachers’ leadership was developed by Katzenmeyer and Moller (2009). Descriptive analysis of mean and standard deviation and inference such as pearson correlation and multiple regression were used to answer questions and hypotheses of the study. The data obtained were analyzed using the SPSS version 20 software. Overall, the findings showed that there were positive and significant relationships (r = .51, p <.01) among professional learning practices with teachers’ leadership. In addition, the findings show that portfolio development (β = .36, t = 7.21, p <.05) is a major predictor of professional learning practices on teachers’ leadership followed by training (β = .22, p <.05) self-directed learning (β = .18, p <.05) and lesson study (β = .11, t = 3.96 and p <.05). In conclusion, professional learning practices, portfolio, training, self-directed learning and lesson study influence the leadership of teachers in vocational colleges in Perak. The implication of this study shows that professional learning practices can enhance the leadership of teachers in vocational colleges for their career development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bush, Tony & Middlewood, David (2005) Leading and managing people in education. London: Sage Publications.

Chua Yan Piaw (2009) Statistik Penyelidikan Lnjutan Ujian Regresi, Analisis Faktor dan Analisis SEM, Buku 5. Selangor: Mc Graw Hill Education.

Creswell, J.W. (2012) Educational Research Planning, Conduction, Evaluating Quantitative and Quantitative Research. Boston MA: Pearson Education Inc.

David Frost (2012) From professional development to system change: teacher leadership and innovation. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 205-227.

Ghazali Darusalam & Sufean Hussin (2016) Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: amalan dan analisis kajian. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Hair Joseph, J., F., William. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson. (2010) Multivatiate data analysis. London: Prentice Hall.

Hair, Jr. J. F., Black, W. C. Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E., (2009) Multivariate data analysis with readings. (7thed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hairon Salleh, (2016) Instructional Leadership in Teacher Leading Professional Learning Communities: An Asian Singapore Perspective. Asia Leadership Roundtable, 1-24.

Jana Hunzicker (2012) Professional development and job-embedded collaboration: how teachers learn to exercise leadership. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 267-289.

Janet C. Fairman & Sarah V. Mackenzie (2012) Spheres of teacher leadership action for learning. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 229-246.

Janet C. Fairman & Sarah V. Mackenzie (2015) How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18(1), 61-87.

Jason Margolis (2012) Hybrid teacher leaders and the new professional development ecology. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 291-315l.

Jullie Ann Van Sickle. (2011). Lesson Study’s Impacts on Teacher Perception of Efficacy in Teaching.Tesis Master yang diterbitkan:Humboldt State University.

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009) Awakening the sleeping giant: helping teachers develop as leaders. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2012) Laporan awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidik Malaysia 2013-2-25. Kuala Lumpur: KPM

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013) Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya, Malaysia: KPM

Knowles, M. S. (1989) The making of an adult educator. San Franciso: Jossey-Bass.

Knowles, M. S. (1990) TheAdult Learner: A Neglected Species (4th ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Professional Publishing.

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 608.

Laura Baecher (2012) Pathways to teacher leadership among English-as-second-language teachers: professional development by and for emerging teacher leaders. Professional Development in Education, 38 (2), 317-330.

Lieberman, A. and Friedrich, L. (2007) Teachers, writers, leaders. Educational leadership, 65 (1), 42–47.

Loh Kok Cheang. (2011) Kepimpinan guru (teacher leadership) di sebuah sekolah menengah kerajaan di Papar: Kes SMK Majakir, Sabah.

Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S. E., & Hewson, P. (2003) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Mahaliza Mansor & Norlia Mat Norwani (2010) Pembangunan profesional berasaskan sekolah: tinjauan awal. Dalam International Management Education Conference 2010 (iMED2010), Melaka: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Mahaliza Mansor (2013) Pembinaan model pembelajaran profesional berasaskan sekolah di sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Tesis. Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan. TanjungMalim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Mahaliza Mansor, Norlia Mat Norwani & Jamal @ Nordin Yunus (2011) Validity and reliability of the school-based professional development leader roles inventory. ManagementResearch Journal, 1(1), 73-87.

Mahaliza Mansor, Norlia Mat Norwani & Jamal @ Nordin Yunus (2013) Hubungan antara model model pembelajaran profesional terhadap amalan guru sekolah menengah harian di Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 6, 1-8.

Murphy, J. (2005) Connecting teacher-leadership to school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Norashikin Abu Bakar, Ramli Basri & Foo Say Fooi (2015) Hubungan Kepimpinan Guru dengan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar. International Journal of Education and Training (InjET), (1) (2), 1-11.

Philip E. Poekert (2012) Teacher leadership and professional development: examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169-188.

Rosnah Binti Ishak, Muhammad Faizal Bin A. Ghani dan Saedah Siraj (2013) “Amalan pembelajaran dalam kalangan guru sekolah berprestasi tinggi,” Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 52-60.

Sekaran (2009) Reasearch Method of Business; A skill-building approach (2nd Edition) New York: Wiley.

Siti Aida (2011) Kepimpinan guru dalam meningkatkan kualiti pegajaran dan pembelajaran di sebuah sekolah mengah harian di Shah Alam. Tesis Sarjana Kepengetuaan. Institut Pengajian Kepengetuaan: Universiti Malaya.

Spark, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989) Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40-57.

Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S., (2006) Using Multivariate Statistics. (5thed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Dana, N. (2010) Powerful professional development: Building expertise within the four walls of your school. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
Published
2018-12-26
How to Cite
Wan Azahari, W. A. F., & Mansor, M. (2018). Pengaruh Amalan Pembelajaran Profesional terhadap Kepimpinan Guru-Guru Kolej Vokasional di Perak. Management Research Journal, 7, 32 - 43. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol7.4.2018