Pembinaan, Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Inventori Kepimpinan Guru

The Development, Validity and Reliability of Teacher Leadership Inventory

  • Mahaliza Mansor Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
  • Mohd Asri Mohd Noor Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
  • Khalip Musa Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
  • Hamidah Yusof Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia
Keywords: exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, teacher leadership

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melaporkan pembinaan, kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan Inventori Kepimpinan Guru (IKG) yang digunakan untuk menilai kepimpinan guru. Fasa pertama kajian telah dijalankan menerusi analisis faktor eksploratori (Exploratory Factor Analysis) terhadap data 60 orang guru terlatih di sekolah rendah kebangsaan di daerah Petaling Perdana, Selangor. Dapatan kajian menerusi analisis faktor eksploratori melalui putaran `orthogonal` kaedah `varimax`telah membentuk tiga faktor IKG. Nilai pekali kebolehpercayaan Alfa Cronbach keseluruhan item adalah .91. Pada fasa kedua kajian pula, analisis faktor pengesahan (Confirmatory Factor Analysis) telah dijalankan terhadap data 244 orang di 6 buah sekolah rendah berprestasi tinggi di Selangor. Tujuan analisis faktor pengesahan dijalankan adalah untuk menyokong dapatan struktur faktor (factor structure) yang terhasil dari kajian fasa pertama. Nilai pekali kebolehpercayaan Alfa Cronbach bagi kesemua item ialah .84 manakala untuk setiap faktor yang terbentuk adalah di antara .76 hingga .88. Kesimpulannya, dapatan bagi analisis faktor pengesahan telah menyokong kewujudan tiga faktor yang telah dibuktikan menerusi analisis faktor eksploratori.

The aim of this article is to report the development, validity and reliability of Teacher Leadership Inventory (IKG), which is used to assess the teacher leadership. The first phase of the study has been carried out through Exploratory Factor Analysis on the 60-trained teachers in the national primary school in Petaling Perdana district, Selangor. The findings of the study by exploratory factor analysis through the `orthogonal` rotation of` varimax` method has formed three IKG factors. The reliability coefficient of Alfa Cronbach's overall value is .91. In the second phase of the study, Confirmatory Factor Analysis has been conducted on 244 samples data from six high-performing primary schools in Selangor. The purpose of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis is to support the findings of the factor structure developed from the first phase study. Alfa Cronbach's reliability coefficient for all items is .84 whereas for each factor formed ranged from .76 to .88. In conclusion, the findings for the validation factor analysis have supported the existence of three factors that have been proven through an exploratory factor analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ab Halim Tamuri, Mahmud, Z., & Bari, S. (2005). Permasalahan pelajar-pelajar fakir miskin di daerah Sabak Bernam. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 30, 21-33.

Abdullah SaniYahaya, Mohamed, A. R., & Abdullah, A. G. (2007). Guru sebagai pemimpin. PTS Professional.

Amin Senin. (2005). Hubungan pengurusan pembangunan profesional sekolah dengan model pembangunan profesional serta pengaruhnya terhadap pengajaran guru di sekolah-sekolah menengah negeri sabah. Tesis. Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan. Kota Kinabalu: Universiti Malaysia Sabah.

Armstrong, A. & Foley, P. (2003). Foundations for a learning organization: organization learning.

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Coups, E. J. (2005). Statistics for psychology [With study guide]. New York: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Azlina Mohd. Kassim (2008). Pengaruh personaliti terhadap kepuasan kerja dan stress kerja guru. Jurnal Teknologi.

Babbie, E. (2007). Practice of social research. United States: Cengage Learning.

Breakwell, P. G., Hammond, D. S. M., Fife-Schaw, D. C., & Smith, P. J. A. (2006). Research methods in psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Byrne, B., M. (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. New York: Routledge.

Choi, N., Fuqua, D. R., & Newman, J. L. (2009) Exploratory and confirmatory studies of the structure of the bem sex role inventory short form with two divergent samples. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 9 (4), 696-705.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge. Danielson, C. (2007). The many faces of leadership. Educational Leadership.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Rothman, R. (2011). Teacher and Leader Effectiveness in High-Performing Education Systems. Alliance for Excellent Education.

Dickey, D. (1996). Testing the fit of our models of psychological dynamics usingconfirmatory methods: An introductory primer. Dalam B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in social science methodology (Vol.4, 219-227). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2012). Spheres of teacher leadership action for learning. Professional Development in Education.

Fairman, J. C., & Mackenzie, S. V. (2014). How teacher leaders influence others and understand their leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, (August), 1–27.

Fareeha Nudrat & Muhammad Saeed (2014). Assessing Potential for Teacher Leadership: The Case of Prospective Teachers. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education. December 2014, Vol.8, No.2, pp 105 -115 http://www.ue.edu.pk/jrre

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.

Frost, D., & Harris, A. (2003). Teacher Leadership: towards a research agenda. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 479–498.
http://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122078

Habib Mat Som & Megat Ahmad Kamaludin Megat Daud (2008). Globalisasi dan Cabaran Pendidikan di Malaysia [Globalization Educational Challenges in Malaysia]. Masalah Pendidikan, 31(1). ms. 91-101.

Hair, J., F., Black, W., C., Babin, B., J., Anderson, R., E., & Tatham R., L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Harris, A., & Muijis, D. (2005). Improving School through Teacher Leadership. (I. Goodson & A. Hargreaves, Eds.). United Kingdom: Maidenhead Open University.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M., (1999) Cut off criteria for fit indices in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modelling, 6, 1-55.

Hunzicker, J. (2013). Attitude has a lot to do with it: dispositions of emerging teacher leadership. Teacher Development, 17(4), 538–561.
doi:10.1080/13664530.2013.849614

Henson, R. K. & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in publishedresearch common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psycological Measurement, 66(3), 393-416.

Icobucchi, D. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Fit indices, sample size and advance topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(2010) 90-98.

Ishak, R., & Ghani, M. F. A. (2012). Best Leadership Practices for “Learning Organization” Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 37(2), 35-41.

Ismail Abas (2007). Peranan Guru Membina Murid Menghadapi Cabaran Wawasan 2020. Jurnal Penyelidikan Pendidikan Institut Perguruan Islam, Selangor, Jilid 10.

Kamarol Baharen Mohd Rom & Johan @ Eddy Luaran (2011). Peranan kepimpinan guru mempengaruhi keberkesanan pengajaran dan pembelajaran sejarah dalam iklim bilik darjah. Dalam Seminar Pendidikan Sejarah dan Geografi 2013. Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Sabah.

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2005). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Corwin Press.

Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Corwin Press.

Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2008). Standard Guru Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Kline, R. B. K. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Edisi ketiga). London: The Guilford Press.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z., (2007) The leadership challenge: The most trusted source on becoming a better leader. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities, educational and psychological measurement. Educational And Psychological Measurement, (30), 607–610.

Landell K. (1997). Management by menu. London: Wiley dan Sons Inc.

Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Mok Song Sang (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Murid dan Alam Belajar. Kuala Lumpur. Penerbitan Multimedia Sdn. Bhd.

Muhammad Faisal, A. G., Norfariza, M. R., Shahril@Charil, M., & Faisol, E. (2011). Pengenalan kepada Amalan Kepimpinan Guru di Malaysia: Cabaran dan Cadangan. Management Research Journal, 3, 71–92.

Nudrat, F., & Akhtar, M. S. (2014). Assessing potential for teacher leadership : The case of prospective teachers. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8(2), 105–115.

Nunnally, J.,C., &Bernstein, I., H., (1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Phelps, P. H., (2008) Helping Teachers Become Leaders. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81 (3)

Poekert, P. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2) ms. 169-188.

Rutledge, R. (2009). Teacher leadership and school improvement: A case study of teachers participating in the teacher leadership network with a regional education service center. Tesis. Ph.D yang tidak diterbitkan. San Marcos: Texas State University.

Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. London: Routledge.

Smylie, M. A., & Denny, J. W., (1990). Teacher Leadership: Tensions and Ambiguities in Organizational Perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly. 26 (235).
DOI: 10.1177/0013161X90026003003

Suranna K,J. & Moss D,N. (2000) Perceptions of teacher leadership: A case study of inservice elementry school teachers. Paper presented at thr Anunual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association : New Orleans, LA, April, p. (14) ERIC : (ED440966)

Syed Ismail Syed Mustapa & Ahmad Subki Maskon (2010). Guru dan cabaran semasa. Selangor: Terbitan Multimedia Sdn Bhd.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon

York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74,255–316.

Zakaria Stapa, Ahmad Munawir, Noranizah Yusuf (2012). Faktor persekitaran sosial dan hubungannya dengan pembentukan jati diri. Jurnal Hadhari, Special edition. pp. 155-172.

Zuraidah Abdullah (2009). Pembentukan komniti pemebelajaran profesional: Kajian terhadap sekolah menengah di Malaysia. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 5(2).
Published
2018-12-26
How to Cite
Mansor, M., Mohd Noor, M. A., Musa, K., & Yusof, H. (2018). Pembinaan, Kesahan dan Kebolehpercayaan Inventori Kepimpinan Guru. Management Research Journal, 7, 132 - 145. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol7.12.2018

Most read articles by the same author(s)