Hubungan Persekitaran Fizikal Bilik Darjah dan Kesejahteraan dan Keselesaan Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran
Relationship between classroom physical environment and teaching and learning comfortness and well-being
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol7.8.2018Keywords:
well-being, comfortness, teaching and learning, classroom physical environmentAbstract
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengenal pasti hubungan persekitaran fizikal bilik darjah dengan tahap kesejahteraan dan keselesaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran pelajar di sekolah menengah Zon Kampar, Perak. Kajian ini melibatkan 196 responden daripada pelajar tingkatan empat daripada empat buah sekolah menengah di Zon Kampar, Perak. Instrumen kajian adalah borang soal selidik. Data kajian dianalisis secara statistik deskriptif menggunakan kaedah frekuensi, peratusan dan min. Manakala data statistik inferens diuji menggunakan Korelasi Pearson. Kaedah ini digunakan untuk menentukan hubungan persekitaran fizikal bilik darjah dengan tahap keselesaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran pelajar. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa hubungan tahap persekitaran fizikal bilik darjah dengan keselesaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran adalah tinggi. Dapatan kajian juga menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang signifikan pada tahap tinggi di antara persekitaran fizikal bilik darjah dengan keselesaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran pelajar di sekolah. Kajian ini mencadangkan agar aspek fizikal haruslah diutamakan supaya pelajar dapat menjalankan proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran dengan penuh kepuasan dan mendapat keselesaan dalam proses pembelajaran.
This study aims to identify the relationship between the physical environment in the classroom and the level of teaching and learning comfortness and well-being of students in Kampar Zone secondary school, Perak. This study involved 196 respondents from form four students from four secondary schools in Kampar Zone, Perak. This study used questionnaire as a research instrument. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistic by using frequency, percentage. While inferential statistical data was tested using the Pearson Correlation. This method is used to determine the relationship between classroom physical environment with the level of teaching and learning well-being and comfortness of the respondents. The result of this study found that the relationship between the level of physical environment of the classroom and the well-being and comfortness of teaching and learning was at high level. The findings also show that there is a significant relationship at the high level between the physical environment of the classroom and the well-being and comfortness of teaching and learning at the school. This study suggests that physical aspects of a classroom should be prioritized so that students and teachers can carry out the process of teaching and learning with satisfaction and gain comfort in the learning process.
Downloads
References
Aladejana, F., & Aderibigbe, O. (2007). Science laboratory environment and academic performance. Journal Science Educational Technology, 16, 500-506.
Aamirah Aiza Zakaria, Lee Yan Di & Melor Md Yunus. (2017). 21st century education in teaching English as a second language (Esl) in Malaysia. Seminar on Transdisiplin Education (STEd 2017), 16-17 Januari.
Amirmudin & Muhammad Rashid. (2010). Physical environment in school setting: Conceptual reviews. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Arzi, H. (2003). Enhancing science education laboratory environment: More than wall, benches and widgets. International Handbook of Science Education, Vol. (1), Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Barnitt. (2003). Lighting for the future. Building Services Journal: The magazine for the CIBSE, 25(1): 38-39.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1991). Making connections: Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Che Nidzam, Kamisah & Laila. (2010). Persekitaran pembelajaran: Aspek fizikal dan psikososial. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Che Nidzam, Kamisah & Laila. (2013). Physical and psychosocial aspects of the learning environment in the science laboratory and their relationship to teacher satisfaction. Learning Environ Res, 16, 367–385.
Che Nidzam, Noraini, Mazlini, Marzita & Mohd Hairy. (2013). Pengaruh persekitaran fizikal bilik darjah terhadap tahap keselesaan pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 6.
Danielson, C. (2011). Enchaining professional practice: A framework for teaching (2ndEdition). North Beauregard Street, Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Earthman, GI (2004). 'Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building adequacy', American civil liberties union foundation of Maryland. Di akses daripada http://www.aclumd.org/aTop%20Issues/Education%20Reform/EarthmanFinal1004.pdf.
Eldor.L & Shoshani. A. (2016). Caring relationships in school staff: Exploring the link between compassion and teacher work engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56(2), 126-136.
Flannery, M. E. (2005, April). Classroom cool. Design aesthetics. National Education Association. Retrieved October 5, 2008 from
http://www.nea.org/neatoday/0504/classroomcool.html.
Fraser, B.J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments: Development, validity and applications. Learning Environment Research: An International Journal, 1, 7-33.
Gardiner, W.L. (1989). Forecasting, Planning and the future of information society. High technology workplace:Integrating technology, management and design for productive work environments, Goumain P. (Ed), 27-39.
Hannah, R. (2013). The effect of classroom environment on student learning. Western Michigan University Scholar Works at WMU.
Hathaway, W., E. (1995). Effects of school lighting on physical development and schoolperformance. The Journal of Educational Research, 88(4), 228-242.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall. K., Woolner, P. & C., McCaughey. (2005). The impact of school environments: A literature review'. The Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Communication and Language Science, University of Newcastle.
Hughes, S. M. (2005). The relationship between school design variables and student achievement in a large urban texas school district. Unpublished Ph. D, Baylor University.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2016). Laporan Tahunan 2016 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia, Kementerian pendidikan Malaysia.
Kennedy, M. (2005). Classroom colors. American School and University, May 2005.
Kruger E. L. & Zannin P. H. T. Acoustic, thermal and luminous comfort in classrooms. Elsevier, 39(9), 1055-1063.
Lackney, J. A. (1999). Assessing school facilities for learning/assessing the impact of the physical environment on the education process. Mississippi State, Miss: Educational Design Institute.
Loughlin, C., and Suina, J. (1982). The learning environment: An instructional strategy. New York: Teachers College Press.
Lyons, F. (2002). Drafting your learning contract: Partnership program. England:University of Portsmouth.
Mendell, M., & Heath, G. (2003). Indoor air quality & student performance (No. 402-K- 95-001). Washington: Indoor Environments Division Office of Radiation and Indoor Air. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Mohd Hizwan, Muhammad Sukri &Yusri. (2017). Meta-analysis Study of Teacher Issues on Higher Order Thinking Skills in Malaysia.World applied sciences Journal 35(12):2520-2523.
Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S. & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research based strategies for every teacher. North Beauregard Street, Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Mucherah, W. (2008). Classroom climate and student’s goal structures in high-school biology classrooms in Kenya. Learning Environment Research, 11, 63-81.
Nur Hidayahtul Jamilah, Shamsidar, Mohd Zafrullah & Mawar. (2014). Principals’perception on classroom physical environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 266 – 273.
Nilsson, T. (2006). Legibility of colored print. In w. Karwowski (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors (Second Edition ed., Vol. 1). Boca Raton London New York: CRC Press LLC.
Nurizah, Ahmad Fauzi & Norhasni. (2011). Persepsi pelajar terhadap persekitaran fizikal makmal komputer: Perbandingan antara dua makmal komputer yang berbeza susunatur. Journal of Techno-Social, 59-74.
Rosenfield, P., & Lambert, N. (1985). Desk arrangement effects on pupil classroom behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 101-108.
Sanoff, H. (2002). Community participation methods in design and planning. New York: Wiley.
Schneider, M. (2002). Linking school facility conditions to teacher satisfaction and success. Washington: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
Tengku Asmad. (2015). Motivasi alihan pelajar. Selangor. PTS Milinea Sdn. Bhd.
Tessmer, M. & Harris, D. (1992). Analysing the instructional setting. New York. Kogan Page Limited.
Waldrip, B., & Fisher, D. (2003). Identifying exemplary science teachers through their classroom interactions with students. Learning Environments Research: An International Journal, 6(2), 157-174.
Weber, W.A. (2006). Classroom management: An analytic-pluralistic process. Classroom Management Handout, Fall 2006. University of Houston, Tx.
Wolska, A. (2003). Visual strain and lighting preferences of VDT users under different lighting systems, JOSE 9(4), 431–440.
Wong, A.F.L., & Fraser, B.J. (1996). Environment-attitude associations in the chemistry laboratory classroom. Research in Science and Technological Education, 14(1), 91-102.
Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Zabel R.H. & Zabel M.K. (1999). Classroom management in context: Orchestrating positive learning environment. Houghton Mifflin Co. Boston Toronto.
Zandvile, D., B. (1999). The physical and psychosocial environment asscociated with classroom using new information technologies. A cross-national study. Thesis PHD. Curtain University of Technology.
Zedan, R. (2010). New dimension in the classroom climate. Learning Environment Research, 13, 75-88.
