Exploring preservice teachers' affective and behavioural responses towards inclusive education: A qualitative inquiry

Authors

  • Syafiqa Qadrina Mohamad Izan Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Nurul Asyhmeera binti Mohammad Zaidi Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Amalia Aina binti Rusli Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Teng Kie Yin Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Lee Hou Yew Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol18.sp.15.2025

Keywords:

Inclusive education, preservice teachers, affective, behavioural, practicum, special educational needs

Abstract

This qualitative study explores preservice teachers’ perceptions of inclusive education (IE), focusing on their preparedness, challenges, and emotional and behavioural responses during practicum, as well as strategies that support effective inclusion. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with six preservice teachers and analysed thematically across two key domains: affective and behavioural. The affective domain highlights preservice teachers’ emotions, attitudes, and values toward IE, while the behavioural domain addresses instructional practices such as differentiated instruction, peer support, and use of assistive technologies. Findings reveal themes including emotional preparedness, communication challenges, instructional adaptation, and classroom management. Although participants demonstrate a strong commitment to inclusion, many feel unprepared to manage classroom dynamics and engage students with special educational needs (SEN), particularly those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) or hearing impairments. The study underscores the need for experiential learning in teacher education programmes and improved support systems to enhance effective and behavioural competencies in inclusive settings. Despite limitations such as small sample size and reliance on self-reports, this study contributes to ongoing discussions on inclusive teacher training and offers practical recommendations for future research and practice. These limitations were acknowledged to maintain transparency in the findings and to suggest future research directions using triangulation and a broader sample base.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Lautenbach, C., & Heyder, K. (2020). A 14-week intervention study on changing preservice teachers’ psychological perspectives on inclusion: Explicit and implicit attitudes, self-efficacy, and stress perception toward inclusion. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00007

Massouti, A. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ perspectives on their preparation for inclusive teaching: Implications for organizational change in teacher education. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2021.1.11139

Mohalik, S. (2024). Impact of inclusive teacher training programs on pre-service teacher educators: A comprehensive exploration. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(1).

Netzer, L., Gutentag, T., Kim, M. Y., Solak, N., & Tamir, M. (2018). Evaluations of emotions: Distinguishing between affective, behavioral and cognitive components. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 13–24. https://doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.038

Puliatte, A., Martin, M., & Bostedor, E. (2021). Examining preservice teacher attitudes and efficacy about inclusive education. SRATE Journal, 30(1), 68–75. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1306230.pdf

Sharma, U., & Sokal, L. (2016). Can teachers be fair to students with disabilities? The impact of contact and experience. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(5), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1095251

Troll, B., Besser, M., Abels, S., Ahlers, M., Greve, S., Leiss, D., & Süßenbach, J. (2019). Preparing Pre-service Teachers for Inclusive Education: Analyzing the Status Quo and Comparing the Effect of Different Types of Subject-Specific Learning Opportunities. Inclusive Mathematics Education, 537–559. https://doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11518-0_31

UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000098427

UNESCO. (2023). Education for sustainable development: Building a better future for all. https://www.unesco.org/en/education

Downloads

Published

2025-09-17

How to Cite

Mohamad Izan, S. Q., Mohammad Zaidi, N. A., Rusli, A. A., Teng, K. Y., & Lee, H. Y. (2025). Exploring preservice teachers’ affective and behavioural responses towards inclusive education: A qualitative inquiry. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 18(Special Issue), 171-177. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol18.sp.15.2025

Most read articles by the same author(s)