The role of digital technologies in enhancing inclusive education: A systematic review of current trends

Authors

  • Teng Kie Yin Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Anthea Yulticia Liden Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Cassandra Racha John Girrie Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Jasnita Naja Dinggat Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Lee Hou Yew Institute of Teacher Education Batu Lintang Campus, Jalan College, Batu Lintang, 93200 Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol18.sp.16.2025

Keywords:

Inclusive Education (IE), Special Educational Needs (SEN), Universal Design for Learning (UDL), Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), personalised learning

Abstract

The integration of digital technologies in Inclusive Education (IE) has gained significant momentum in recent years, enhancing accessibility, engagement, and personalised learning for diverse learners, including students with Special Educational Needs (SEN). This small-scale systematic review explores the latest trends in digital applications supporting IE, drawing on studies published between 2020 and 2025. Five major academic databases—Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, IEEE Xplore, and Wiley Online Library—were used to identify peer-reviewed literature aligned with the objectives of the review. Adherence to the PRISMA framework enhanced the transparency and replicability of the review process. Key emerging trends include assistive technologies such as speech-to-text and text-to-speech tools, AI-driven personalised learning systems, and game-based learning platforms that support students with SEN. Additionally, immersive technologies such as augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) are fostering interactive and differentiated instruction, enhancing learning experiences for students with SEN. Mobile learning and cloud-based platforms are also promoting universal design for learning (UDL) principles, ensuring flexibility in content delivery. However, challenges such as the digital divide, teacher training gaps, and concerns over data privacy remain. Addressing these challenges requires strategic investments in infrastructure, professional development, and ethical policies to optimise digital inclusivity. The findings suggest that a thoughtful integration of digital tools can significantly improve inclusivity in education, fostering equity and engagement for all learners. Future research should explore how emerging technologies, such as AI-driven adaptive learning and blockchain-based credentialing, can further enhance inclusive digital education. This review contributes to the growing body of literature on digital inclusivity and highlights implications for policymakers, educators, and researchers seeking to improve accessibility and learning outcomes in diverse educational settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, S., & Brown, J. (2023). Virtual reality for differentiated instruction in inclusive classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(2), 231–245.

British Journal of Educational Technology. (2022). Special issue: Teacher training in digital education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(S2), 1–20.

British Journal of Educational Technology. (2023). Ethical considerations in AI-driven education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(3), 312–330.

Chekirova, A., & Ashirov, T. (2024). Artificial intelligence and its implications for data privacy. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 75, 103456.

Chekirova, G. K., & Ashirov, E. T. (2024). Use of digital technologies in education: Current trends and development prospects. Vestnik Issyk-Kulskogo Universiteta, 59, 41–47.

Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta-analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–207.

IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies. (2023). Advancements in teacher digital competencies. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(2), 98–112.

Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. (2023). Community-based digital learning hubs for equity in education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 23(1), 54–69.

Mukherjee, P., & Jones, K. (2024). Game-based learning and cognitive development for SEN students. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24(1), 22–36.

Mukan, N., Barna, O., & Maksymchuk, B. (2025). Mobile learning platforms and digital accessibility. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 17(1), 14–29.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Peters, D., & Wilson, M. (2024). Overcoming barriers in digital inclusivity: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(1), 45–62.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education – A tool on whose terms?

Downloads

Published

2025-09-17

How to Cite

Teng, K. Y., Liden, A. Y., John Girrie, C. R., Dinggat, J. N., & Lee, H. Y. (2025). The role of digital technologies in enhancing inclusive education: A systematic review of current trends. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 18(Special Issue), 178-184. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol18.sp.16.2025

Most read articles by the same author(s)