The development of an assessment instrument of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for primary science teachers in Malaysia
The TPACK framework represents the knowledge needed by teachers bringing together content knowledge, technological knowledge and pedagogical knowledge with the aim of integrating ICTs into teaching-learning processes. The aim of this study is to addresses the need for a survey instrument designed to assess TPACK for primary science teachers in Malaysia. The paper describes survey development process and results from 220 prımary science teachers in Malaysia (Female= 106, Male= 104). Data were collected through “Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge” (TPACK) scale. The questionnaire consisted of 47 questions within 7 factors about TPACK and is based on the survey instrument developed by Schmidt et al., (2009). Data analysis procedures included Cronbach’s alpha statistics on the TPACK knowledge domains and factor analysis for each domain. Results suggest that, with the modification and/or deletion of 5 of the survey items, the survey is a reliable and valid instrument that will help researchers to assess primary science teachers’ perceptions of TPACK. In future research, other variables might be included to analyze their impact on preservice science teachers’ TPACK.
DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of Factor Analysis. Retrieved August 20, 2016, from
Fu, J. S. (2013). ICT in Education: A Critical Literature Review and Its Implications. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 9(1), 112–125.
Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.
Harris, J. B., & Hofer, M. J. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in action: A descriptive study of secondary teachers’ curriculum-based, technologyrelated instructional planning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 211.
Hasniza Nordin. (2014). Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK and Experience of ICT Integration in Schools in Malaysia and New Zealand. University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Junnaina, H. C., & Hazri, J. (2014). The Effect of Field Specialization Variation on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Among Malaysian TVET Instructors. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(1), 36–44.
Karadeniz, Ş., & Vatanartıran, S. (2013). Adaptation of a TPACK survey to Turkish for secondary school teachers. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 34 – 47. Retrieved from
Khaddage, Ferial, & Knezek, G. (2013). Introducing a Mobile Learning Attitude Scale for Higher Education. In X World Conference on Computers in Education,. Toruń, Poland.
Koç, M. (2005). Implications of Learning Theories for Effective Technology Integration and Pre-service Teacher Training: A Critical Literature Review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 2(1), 2–18.
Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International Publishers.
Kubiatko, M., & Haláková, Z. (2009). Slovak High School Students’ Attitudes to ICT Using in Biology Lesson. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 743–748.
Look, D. (2005). Discussion Paper: Impact of Technology on Education.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Mohd Zaki M., Faizal M.A., Erman H., Nazrulazhar B., A., Nor Azman M., & Y., A. N. (2009). ICT Development In Malaysia. In Paper presented at the Seminar on Information Technology 2009 (SemiT 2009). SemiT 2009.
Sahin, I. (2011). Development of Survey of Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK). Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(1), 97–105.
Schmidt, D. a., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Koehler, M. J., Shin, T. S., & Mishra, P. (2009). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK): The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-303-9.
Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2).
Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1–32.
Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’ s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis, 9(2), 79–94.