Developing an Integrated Framework for Creativity-Enhanced STEM Out-of-School Activities: A Case Study of Lanna Lantern Making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol14.1.13.2026Keywords:
STEM education , creative thinking, out-of-school activities, culturally responsive teaching , integrated framework, Lanna lanternAbstract
This study addresses the lack of a coherent framework that integrates STEM instruction, creativity development, and culturally responsive pedagogy within out-of-school learning contexts. A three-phase Design and Development Research approach was adopted. Phase one involved documentary analysis and expert consultation to identify STEM elements embedded in traditional Lanna lantern making. Phase two focused on systematic framework construction by aligning a seven-stage STEM inquiry model with an A-to-E creativity framework. Phase three consisted of expert validation through a structured focus group involving five purposively selected specialists, applying a consensus-based evaluation with an 80% agreement threshold. The findings demonstrated substantial STEM integration across science, technology, engineering, and mathematics domains, particularly in light transmission, material properties and selection, structural design, and geometric measurement. The resulting framework was translated into a six-hour instructional module comprising 20 structured sub-activities for upper primary learners, with explicit alignment between STEM inquiry processes and creativity indicators. Expert evaluation confirmed the framework’s conceptual coherence, cultural relevance, and practical feasibility for implementation. This study provides a validated pedagogical framework that systematically integrates creativity and inquiry-based STEM learning within a culturally meaningful out-of-school setting. The framework offers educators a practical tool for designing contextualised STEM experiences that promote creative thinking alongside structured investigation. Future research should focus on empirical implementation with students to evaluate learning outcomes and creativity enhancement.
Downloads
References
Bridges EM, Hallinger P. (1995). Implementing Problem Based Learning in Leadership Development. Univ of Oregon Eric Clearinghouse.
Brown P. (2024). Education, opportunity and the future of work in the fourth industrial revolution. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 45(4), 475-493. doi:10.1080/01425692.2023.2299970
Conradty C, Bogner FX. (2020). STEAM teaching professional development works: effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). doi:10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9
Di Battista A, Grayling S, Hasselaar E, Leopold T, Li R, Rayner M, Zahidi S. (2023). Future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum, 972-978.
Elo S, Kyngas H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Erkan H, Duran M. (2023). The effects of STEM activities conducted with the flipped learning model on primary school students’ scientific creativity, attitudes and perceptions towards STEM. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 15(1), 2175-2225. doi:10.15354/sief.23.or115
Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Gay G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
Ghani NSHA, Lee TT, Wang J, Rusmansyah. (2026). Integrating augmented reality in Chemistry Education: The impact of the augmented reality chemistry student investigation (AR-CSI) module on content knowledge and 21st century skills. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 14(1), 46-58. doi:10.37134/jsml.vol14.1.5.2026
Gomes DM, McCauley V. (2021). Creativity in science: A dilemma for informal and formal education. Science Education, 105(3), 498-520. doi:10.1002/sce.21614
Grabowsky V. (2005). Population and state in Lan Na prior to the mid-sixteenth century. Journal of the Siam Society, 93, 1-68.
Grabowsky V. (2015). Military Traditions and Society in Lan Na. Tai Culture, 24, 140-157.
Hebebci MT, Usta E. (2022). The effects of integrated STEM education practices on problem solving skills, scientific creativity, and critical thinking dispositions. Participatory Educational Research, 9(6), 358-379. doi:10.17275/per.22.143.9.6
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
Johnson A. (2010). Rebuilding Lanna: Constructing and consuming the past in urban Northern Thailand. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.
Kennedy TJ, Sundberg CW. (2020). 21st century skills. In Science education in theory and practice: An introductory guide to learning theory, Springer International Publishing.
Khureerung AC, Thao-Do TP. (2022). Enhancing pre-service teachers' understanding of science teaching through STEM activities integrated inquiry learning with Thai context. Journal of Educational Issues, 8(2), 257. doi:10.5296/jei.v8i2.20030
Kitzinger J. (1995). Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311, 299. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
Krueger RA, Casey MA. (2015). Focus Group Interviewing. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119171386.ch20
McKenney S, Reeves T. (2018). Conducting Educational Design Research. Routledge.
Morgan DL. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Sage Publishing.
Murcia K, Pepper C, Joubert M, Cross E, Wilson S. (2020). A framework for identifying and developing children’s creative thinking while coding with digital technologies. Issues in Educational Research, 30(4), 1395-1417.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
OECD/UNESCO. (2016). Reviews of National Policies for Education Education in Thailand An OECD-UNESCO Perspective: An OECD-UNESCO Perspective. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264259119-en
Panergayo AAE, Prudente MS. (2024). Effectiveness of design-based learning in enhancing scientific creativity in STEM education: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(5), 1182-1196. doi:10.46328/ijemst.4306
Patton MQ. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publishing.
Payadnya IPAA, Wulandari IGAPA, Puspadewi KR, Saelee S. (2024). The significance of ethnomathematics learning: a cross-cultural perspectives between Indonesian and Thailand educators. Journal for Multicultural Education, 18(4), 508-522. doi:10.1108/JME-05-2024-0049
Peleg A, Levy ST. (2025). The impact of makerspaces in early childhood education on children’s creativity and self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 1-19. doi:10.1080/02568543.2025.2468489
Penth H. (2001). A brief history of Lanna: Northern Thailand from past to present. Silkworm Books.
Permanasari A, Rubini B, Pursitasari ID, Nurramadhani A, Hadiana D, Suwarma IR, Kumano Y. (2024). Fun classroom: How seven graders and science teachers respond to stem learning as the first experience in suburban area? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 55-63. doi:10.15294/jpii.v13i1.47386
Plucker JA. (2023). The patient is thriving! current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Creativity Research Journal, 35(3), 291-303. doi:10.1080/10400419.2022.2110415
Reigeluth CM, Carr-Chellman AA. (2009). Instructional-design theories and models. Building a Common Knowledge Base, Vol. 3, Routledge.
Richey RC, Klein JD. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, Strategies, and Issues. Routledge.
Richey RC. (2006). Validating instructional design and development models. In Innovations In Instructional Technology, Routledge.
Roberts T, Jackson C, Mohr-Schroeder MJ, Bush SB, Maiorca C, Cavalcanti M, Craig Schroeder D, Delaney A, Putnam L, Cremeans C. (2018). Students’ perceptions of STEM learning after participating in a summer informal learning experience. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 35. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0133-4
Shernoff DJ. (2024). Makerspaces and STEM/STEAM Education. In D. J. Shernoff (Ed.), Integrative STEM and STEAM Education for Real-Life Learning, Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69824-8_6
Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT, Krahn J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 6(1), 1-21.
Stewart DW, Shamdasani PN. (2014). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publishing.
Sutaphan S, Yuenyong C. (2019). STEM Education Teaching approach: Inquiry from the Context Based. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340(1). doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012003
Taha H, Subramaniam T. (2020). A correlational study between parental awareness of STEM education and student’s enrolment for STEM-related subjects for upper secondary school level. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 8(2), 8-14. doi:10.37134/jsml.vol8.2.2.2020
Taptamat N. (2023). Culturally Responsive Science Education for Rural Students: Connecting School Science with Local Heritages in Thailand. In: Chinn, P.W.U., Nelson-Barber, S. (eds) Indigenous STEM Education. Sociocultural Explorations of Science Education, Vol 29. Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-30451-4_7
Tenney K, Stringer BP, LaTona-Tequida T, White I. (2023). Conceptualizations and Limitations of STEM Literacy across Learning Theories. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 24(1), e00168-22. doi:10.1128/jmbe.00168-22
Thao NP, Huong LTT, Dinh NV, Hang NTT, Quyen CV, Cuong LM, Thao TTP. (2024). Current situation of primary school teachers’ integrated stem teaching competence: An exploratory study in the northern mountainous provinces of Vietnam. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 64-75. doi:10.15294/jpii.v13i1.49636
Toma RB, Greca IM. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383-1395. doi:10.29333/ejmste/83676
Tracey MW. (2009). Design and development research: a model validation case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 553-571. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9075-0
Van den Akker J, Gravemeijer K, McKenney S, Nieveen N. (2006). Quality criteria for design research: Evidence and commitments. In Educational design research, Routledge.
Windschitl M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112-143. doi:10.1002/sce.10044
Yuenyong C. (2019). Lesson learned of building up community of practice for STEM education in Thailand. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2081(1). doi:10.1063/1.5093997
Zhou D, Gomez R, Wright N, Rittenbruch M, Davis J. (2022). A design-led conceptual framework for developing school integrated STEM programs: the Australian context. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 383-411. doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09619-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pathompong Chummongkol, Jiraporn Tupsai, Chockchai Yuenyong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
