Analysis of Oral Mode Communication Strategy in Teaching DLP Form-One Mathematics: A Case Study

Analisis Strategi Komunikasi Mod Lisan Dalam Pengajaran Matematik Tingkatan Satu DLP: Satu Kajian Kes

  • Kenny Chin Aik Kang Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA
  • Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, MALAYSIA
Keywords: Oral communication strategy, mathematics communication

Abstract

This case study is on purpose to analyze the oral mode communication strategy in teaching mathematics (SKMLPM) of five form-one (T1) Dual Language Programme (DLP) class mathematics teachers, at national-type secondary schools, Kinta Utara, Ipoh, Perak. SKMLPM consists of noise-extinguisher, voice-controller, voice-equalizer, voice-mixer and voice-recorder. T1-DLP-mathematics teacher faces challenge to implement oral mathematics communication and needs a detailed guide. This study provides a guide for T1-DLP-mathematics teacher to implement oral mathematics communication, and a reflection to Secondary School Standard Curriculum planner about learning and facilitating’s situation in school from communication perspective. Data collection methods were teaching observation, interview, fieldwork’s note and document analysis. Content analysis method was used to analyze the data. The research’s findings indicate that the number of participants who had the SKMLPM’s goal, cognitive domain (five), affective domain (four), and psychomotor domain (none). Affective domain’s level is limited within receiving and giving response. Five participants implemented SKMLPM at component phase. Only two participants implemented half-voiced voice-recorder. Five participants had the common problem, time constraint and teaching aids (ABM) voice-mixing problem. Conclusion, the SKMLPM’s goals of the participants were not holistic. The participants implemented SKMLPM through enhancing the constructing sound and lessening the disturbing sound. Participants faced problem during implementing SKMLPM. The implication of this study is teachers should (i) plan holistic SKMLPM’s goals. (ii) enhance SKMLPM component performance skills. (iii) plan time management and ABM selection. Future study is required to study the effectiveness of SKMLPM, teacher’s understanding about SKMLPM’s goals, the relation between voice-level practice and student’s ability to control voice-level, and teacher’s perspective towards the implementation of half-voiced voice-recorder.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashairi Suliman, Mohamed Yusoff Mohd Nor & Melor Md Yunus (2018). Dual Language Programme (DLP) students’ level of enthusiasm and confidence: A preliminary study. Journal of Teaching and Learning English in Multiculcural Contexts, 2(1), 13-22.

Ashairi Suliman, Mohamed Yusoff Mohd Nor & Melor Md Yunus (2020). Dual-Language Programme (DLP) implementation in Malaysian secondary schools: from the lense of school administrators. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 45(1), 60-67.

Alten, S. R. (2014). Audio in media. Australia: Wardsworth Cengage Learning.

DeVito, J. A. (2007). The interpersonal communication book. Boston: Pearson.

Ismail Mat Hasan & Md Yusoff Daud (2020). Keberkesanan Dual Language Program (DLP) terhadap pengetahuan, sikap dan tingkah laku pelajar matematik. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(1), 31-39.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2018). Garis panduan pelaksanaan Dual Language Programme (DLP) di sekolah-sekolah Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia mulai tahun 2018. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum.

Melor Md Yunus (2017). The use of English in teaching mathematics and science: The PPSMI policy vis-(a ) ́-vis the DLP. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 8(1), 133-142.

Moses, E. & Malani, I. (2019). Dual Language Programme: The perceptions and challenges of teachers and students I Klang, Selangor. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik, 9(1), 36-48.

Nadiah Has Bullah & Melor Md Yunus (2018). Teachers’ perception on the implementation of Dual Language Programme (DLP) in urban schools. Asian Social Science, 15(1), 24-31.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston: VA.

Pantaleon, K.V., Juniati, D. & Lukito, A. (2018). The oral mathematics communication profile of prospective mathematics teacher in mathematics proving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108, 1-2.

Said Muhammmad Khan (2017). Influence of speech anxiety on oral communication skills among ESL/EFL learners. Dlm Pessoa, E. (Pnyt.). Communication and learning. New York: Magnum.

Shannon, & Weaver. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. London: University of Illinos Press.

Tubbs, S.L., & Moss, S. (2006). Human communication: Principles and contexts. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

Umi Kalsom Masrom, Mardiana Idris & Zailani Jusoh. (2021). Dual Language Programme (DLP): Mediating effects of readiness, interest and confidence on students’ satisfaction. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(2), 1-20.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (ed. ke-5). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Published
2022-07-15
How to Cite
Kang, K. C. A., & Abdullah, M. F. N. L. (2022). Analysis of Oral Mode Communication Strategy in Teaching DLP Form-One Mathematics: A Case Study. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 10(2), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol10.2.2.2022