Digital Game-Based Learning with the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Physics: What Are the Implications in Teaching and Learning? A Review
Keywords:
Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL), Artificial Intelligence, Physics EducationAbstract
Technological advances provide support to education in presenting more relevant and effective learning. One of the technological tools that is popularly implemented in physics learning as a learning medium is Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). These two technologies have various impacts on their use in the learning process. However, the review of the impact of learning from various previous researchers on the technology on physics learning is still limited. This literature review aims to identify the impact and challenges of applying DGBL and AI in physics learning. The method used for this article review is based on four stages. The first stage is the formulation of planning by determining the formulation of research questions. The second stage is the search for articles from Scopus, ProQuest, ERIC, Google Scholar, and open-access databases. Articles are obtained based on searches with keywords in the title and abstract and are in the range of 2020 to 2024. The third stage is to assess articles based on the focus of studies that discuss AI, DGBL, and physics. The search results resulted in as many as 20 articles that are worth reviewing. Based on the results of the literature review, the fourth stage is to write information about the impact and challenges of using technologies in physics learning. DGBL and AI have proven to be effective in supporting students' interest, motivation, and engagement in learning. AI supports features that can be personalized according to students' learning abilities, and DGBL supports interactive learning presentations. Those various features presented can enhance students' comprehension of concepts for better results in understanding abstract physics material. Those technologies also have their own challenges. The over-reliability of this technology can cause plagiarism in learning and affect students' focus in learning. In general, those technologies strongly support physics learning, especially to encourage interest and motivation in students' learning. This media is a form of technology recommendation for teachers and students to support physics learning.
Downloads
References
PISA, O. (2023). PISA 2022: Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA, OECD Publishing Paris.
Ajang, E. E., & Yasin, R. M. (2024). Keberkesanan Penggunaan Aplikasi Pembelajaran Interaktif dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi serta Pencapaian Pelajar dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 9(1), e002469–e002469.
Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2021). Laporan analisis keputusan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia Tahun 2020. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59–109.
Amado, C. M., & Roleda, L. (2019). Student engagement in a gamified Physics course. Proceedings of the International Conference on Future of Education, 2(1), 85–95.
Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., & Dhanil, M. (2023). Augmented reality dan virtual reality berbasis konflik kognitif,sebagai media pembelajaran abad ke-21. Rajawali Pers.
Soon Tan, C., Zakuan, N., & Ismail Abd Aziz, M. (2022). Recent trends of blended learning and flipped classroom in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 2nd Special Issue on Covid, 19.
Rose, J. A., O’Meara, J. M., Gerhardt, T. C., & Williams, M. (2016). Gamification: using elements of video games to improve engagement in an undergraduate physics class. Physics Education, 51(5), 55007.
Henukh, A., & Guntara, Y. (2020). Analyzing the response of learners to use kahoot as gamification of learning physics. Gravity: Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 6(1).
Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., Usmeldi, M. D., & Tanjung, M. R. (2023). The Effectiveness of Smartphone-Based Interactive Multimedia Integrated Cognitive Conflict Models to Improve 21st-Century Skills. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1991
Firat, M. (2023). How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education?
Gill, S. S., Xu, M., Patros, P., Wu, H., Kaur, R., Kaur, K., Fuller, S., Singh, M., Arora, P., & Parlikad, A. K. (2024). Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging Era of AI Chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 19–23.
Kitchenham, B., & Brereton, P. (2013). A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Information and software technology, 55(12), 2049–2075.
Nafidiah, F. Z., Parno, P., Fitriyah, I. J., Fardhani, I., Nida, S., & Suprihatin, R. (2023). Development of DGBL based PBL-STEM to stimulate scientific literacy of junior high school students in climate change analyzing activities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2569(1), 60002.
Abenes, F. M. D., Caballes, D. G., & San Luis, K. B. L. (2020). Assessment of Students in DGBL in Teaching Physics 7. CiiT International Journal of Automation and Autonomous System, 12(3), 62–69.
Chen, C.-H., Huang, K., & Liu, J.-H. (2020). Inquiry-enhanced DGBL: Effects on secondary students’ conceptual understanding in science, game performance, and behavioral patterns. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29, 319–330.
Low, J. Y., Balakrishnan, B., & Yaacob, M. I. H. (2023). Game-based learning: current practices and perceptions of secondary school physics teachers in Malaysia. The international journal of science, mathematics and technology learning, 31(1), 1.
Gaviño, M., & Aliazas, J. V. (2024). Physics Quest: Digital Game-Based Lessons for Seventh Grade.
Wang, Y. (2022). Effects of augmented reality game-based learning on students’ engagement. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 12(3), 254–270.
Kuo, C.-H., Chen, M.-J., Nababan, R., & She, H.-C. (2023). Space adventure game-based learning: How games and scaffolds affect eighth graders’ physics learning and game immersion. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 229–240.
Chen, C.-H., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2023). Adaptive scaffolding and engagement in DGBL. Educational technology research and development, 71(4), 1785–1798.
Lau, J. T. H., Tho, S. W., & Radzwan, A. (2022). The Development and Usability of a Force and Motion Digital Game using Game-based learning (GBL) among Student Teachers in Malaysia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1), 12049.
Nadeem, M., Oroszlanyova, M., & Farag, W. (2023). Effect of DGBL on student engagement and motivation. Computers, 12(9), 177.
Ding, L., Li, T., Jiang, S., & Gapud, A. (2023). Students’ perceptions of using ChatGPT in a physics class as a virtual tutor. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 63.
Bruneau, P., Wang, J., Cao, L., & Trương, H. (2023). The Potential of ChatGPT to Enhance Physics Education in Vietnamese High Schools.
Domenichini, D., Bucchiarone, A., Chiarello, F., Schiavo, G., & Fantoni, G. (2024). An AI-Driven Approach for Enhancing Engagement and Conceptual Understanding in Physics Education. 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/educon60312.2024.10578670
Kersten, P., & Pape, M. M. (2024). AI Chatbots In University Courses From The Perspective Of First Semester STEM Students. EDULEARN24 Proceedings, 945–952.
Ingrams, A., Kaufmann, W., & Jacobs, D. (2022). In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making. Policy & Internet, 14(2), 390–409.
Drach, I., Petroye, O., Borodiyenko, O., Reheilo, I., Bazeliuk, O., Bazeliuk, N., & Slobodianiuk, O. (2023). The use of AI in higher education. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 15, 66–82.
Wheeler, S., & Scherr, R. E. (2023). ChatGPT reflects student misconceptions in physics. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference (PERC), 386–390.
Küchemann, S., Steinert, S., Revenga, N., Schweinberger, M., Dinc, Y., Avila, K. E., & Kuhn, J. (2023). Physics task development of prospective physics teachers using ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10014. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.8478
Çoban, A., & Çoban, N. (2023). Use of ChatGPT in Physics Education. Academic Press.
Lieb, A., & Goel, T. (2024). Student Interaction with NewtBot: An LLM-as-tutor Chatbot for Secondary Physics Education. Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i1.8942
Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Pervasive learning and technology usage for creativity development in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(3), 130-140.
Mirzayeva, G. (2023). The role of digital educational technologies in teaching physics. Science and innovation, 2(B4), 211–216.
Mufit, F., Hendriyani, Y., & Dhanil, M. (2024). Design immersive virtual reality (IVR) with cognitive conflict to support practical learning of quantum physics. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.36681/
Pramesthi, J. B., & Susanti, E. (2024). Inovasi Permainan Digital dalam Meningkatkan Kepekaan Remaja terhadap Isu Lingkungan. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Budaya, 10(3), 655–666.
Okariz, A., Huebra, M., Sarasola, A., Ibarretxe, J., Bidegain, G., & Zubimendi, J. L. (2023). Gamifying Physics Laboratory Work Increases Motivation and Enhances Acquisition of the Skills Required for Application of the Scientific Method. Education Sciences, 13(3), 302.
Chen, C.-H., & Chang, C.-L. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-assisted game-based learning on science learning outcomes, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and learning behavior. Education and Information Technologies, 1–22.
de Zárate, D. O., Castañeda, R., Mercade, L., Gómez, V. J., Rubio, A. D., Díaz-Fernández, F. J., Lozano, M. S., Navarro-Arenas, J., Barreda, A., & Gomez, M. G. (2024). ENHANCING K-12 STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN CHEMISTRY THROUGH CHATGPT-POWERED BLENDED LEARNING IN THE EDUCATION 4.0 ERA. INTED2024 Proceedings, 3920–3929.
Ahmed, H. D., & Asiksoy, G. (2021). The effects of gamified flipped learning method on student’s innovation skills, self-efficacy towards virtual physics lab course and perceptions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10163.
Jauhiainen, J. S., & Guerra, A. G. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT in school children’s education: Evidence from a school lesson. Sustainability, 15(18), 14025.
Motlagh, N. Y., Khajavi, M., Sharifi, A., & Ahmadi, M. (2023). The impact of AI on the evolution of digital education: A comparative study of openAI text generation tools including ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, and Ernie. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.02029.
Paunovic, V., Uyar, S., & Tanic, M. (2023). Implementing Chat GPT in Moodle for Enhanced eLearning Systems.
Xu, F., Nguyen, T., & Du, J. (2024). Augmented reality for maintenance tasks with ChatGPT for automated text-to-action. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 150(4), 4024015.
Orhani, S., & Shatri, K. (2014). Experiential Learning Based on Computer Games. International Conference on Science, Innovations and Global Solutions.
Wardani, M. E., & Kiptiyah, S. M. (2024). Game-Based Learning Model with Baamboozle Media Based on AI Increases Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(2).
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2023). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fitri M.N, Suriani Abu Bakar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
