The Identification of Criteria for a Lab Report Scoring Checklist to Assess Practical Skills Indirectly in an Undergraduate Optics Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol10.2.10.2022Keywords:
development, assessment tool, indirect assessment, practical skillsAbstract
Practical skills are essential skills in physics courses, especially in the laboratory setting. Therefore, these skills must be appropriately assessed to ensure undergraduates' readiness in the working environment with adequate skills. This paper aims to identify the criteria for a scoring checklist to assess practical skills indirectly in an undergraduate optics course. This study employed a Developmental Research Type 1 design using qualitative and quantitative methods. A scoring checklist is constructed using the ADDIE instructional model of five main phases: (1) Analysis, (2) Design, (3) Development, (4) Implementation, and (5) Evaluation. In this paper, the researcher describes the first three phases of producing the lab report scoring checklist to assess practical skills indirectly among undergraduates in an optics course. In conclusion, a set of 47 criteria to assess practical skills indirectly among undergraduates in an optics course has been identified and is ready for the next stages of analysis. The process of identifying suitable criteria can be replicated where applicable to another course to identify or generate criteria that fit the study context.
Downloads
References
Abrahams, I., & Reiss, M. J. (2015). Assessment of practical skills. School Science Review, 357, 40-44.
Achumba, I. E., Azzi, D., Dunn, V. L., & Chukwudebe, G. A. (2013). Intelligent performance assessment of students' laboratory work in a virtual electronic laboratory environment. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 6(2), 103-116.
Beagles, A., Beck, S., Cross, L., Garrard, A., & Rowson, J. (2016). Guidance for Writing Lab Reports. The University of Sheffield.
Brookhart, S.M. (2018). Appropriate criteria: key to effective rubrics. Frontiers in Education, 3, 22.
Davis, M. H. (2003). Outcome-Based Education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 30(3), 258-263.
Fadzil, H. M., & Saat, R. M. (2018). Development of instrument in assessing students' science manipulative skills. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 47-57.
Hammerman, E. (2008). Formative assessment strategies for enhanced learning in science, k-8. Corwin Press.
Hancock, L. M., & Hollamby, M. J. (2020). Assessing the practical skills of undergraduates: the evolution of a station-based practical exam. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(4), 972-979.
Kaliannan, M., & Chandran, S. D. (2006). Empowering students through outcome-based education (OBE). Research in Education, 87(1), 50-63.
Killpack, T. L., & Fulmer, S. M. (2018). Development of a tool to assess interrelated experimental design in introductory biology. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(3), 1-10.
Kolivand, M., Esfandyari, M., & Heydarpour, S. (2020). Examining validity and reliability of objective structured clinical examination for evaluation of clinical skills of midwifery undergraduate students: a descriptive study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-7.
Leshe, S. (2016). Developing and implementing assessment moderation procedures to evaluate written laboratory reports. African Journal of Chemical Education, 6(1), 31-46.
Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2017). Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) Second Edition. 1-39.
McLeod, S. (2019). What are independent and dependent variables. Simply Psychology. www.simplypsychology.org/variables.html
Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(2), 172-185.
Simpson, E. J. (1971). Educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Behavioral Objectives in Curriculum Development: Selected Readings and Bibliography, 60(2), 1-35.
Talha, M., Elmarzouqi, N., & Abou El Kalam, A. (2020). Towards a powerful solution for data accuracy assessment in the big data context. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(2), 419-429.
Turbek, S. P., Chock, T., Donahue, K., Havrilla, C., Oliverio, A., Polutchko, S., Shoemaker, L., & Vimercati, L. (2016). Scientific writing made easy: A step-by-step guide to undergraduate writing in the biological sciences. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5644–5652.
Wright, J. S., Read, D., Hughes, O., & Hyde, J. (2018). Tracking and assessing practical chemistry skills development: practical skills portfolios. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 13(1), 1-5.
Zhang, M. J., Newton, C., Grove, J., Pritzker, M., & Ioannidis, M. (2020). Design and assessment of a hybrid chemical engineering laboratory course with the incorporation of student-centred experiential learning. Education for Chemical Engineers, 30, 1-8.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhamad Zulhelmi Othman, Shahrul Kadri Ayop, Siti Nursaila Alias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
