Inter-School Synchronous Peer Collaboration in Enhancing the Science Process Skills of Controlling Variables and Formulating Hypothesis Among Low Achieving Year Five Pupils

Kolaborasi Rakan Sebaya Antara Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kemahiran Proses Sains bagi Mengawal Pembolehubah dan Formulasi Hipotesis dalam Kalangan Murid Tahun Lima yang Berpencapaian Rendah

  • Thiyagu Karupaiah USM
  • Esther Daniel Gnanamalar Sarojini USM
Keywords: Science Education, Science Process Skills, Inter-School Collaboration, Technology Integration, Google Hangouts



Science teachers must always try to create innovative learning environments to enhance learning through a variety of teaching-learning approaches. The study focus discussed in this article was to enhance the researcher’s low achieving year five pupil’s science process skills of controlling variables and formulating hypothesis skills through synchronous inter-school peer collaboration. The researcher prepared the Variable Identification and Formulating Hypothesis Tool (VIFH-tool) which consisted of a hands-on activity to assess the pupils for the two skills. A two-cycle action research was conducted. In the first cycle the researcher taught the two process skills and the pupils carried out the activity in the VIFH-tool. In the second cycle, a peer collaborative session was arranged with a high achieving group of students from another school. The inter-school collaborative session was conducted via a video call using Google Hangouts. In the session, the low achieving pupils presented their results for the VIFH-tool, after which there was discussion and questions and answers between pupils of the two schools about the two science process skills. Then the low achieving pupils individually repeated the activity in the VIFH-tool. The data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics. The study revealed that most of the low achieving pupils did better at the end of the second cycle.


Download data is not yet available.


Al-Rahmi, W. M., Othman, M. S., & Yusuf, L. M. (2015). The Role of Social Media for Collaborative Learning to Improve Academic Performance of Students and Researchers in Malaysian Higher Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 177-204.

Ambross, J., Meiring , L., & Blignaut, S. (2014). The implementation and development of science process skills in the natural sciences: A case study of teachers' perceptions. Africa Education Review, 11(3), 459-474.

Ansari, J. A., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of learning. Smart Learning Environments, 7(9), 1-16.

Armstrong, P. (2015). Effective school partnerships and collaboration for school improvement: a review of the evidence. Department for Education.

Daniel, E. G. (2013, April 02). Asia Pacific science education in a knowledge society. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 33(2), 170-182.

Eady, M. J., & Lockyer, L. (2013). Tools for learning: technology and teaching strategies. Learning to Teach in the Primary School, 71.

Facebook. (2021, April 15). Policies and reporting.

Faridah Darus & Rohaida Mohd Saat. (2014, April). How Do Primary School Students Acquire the Skill Of Making Hypothesis? The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 20-26.

Ghavifekr, S. (2020). Collaborative Learning: A Key To Enhance Students' Social Interaction Skills. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(4), 9-21.

Google. (2021, April 15). Hangouts Help.

Harlen, W. (1999). Purposes and Procedures for Assessing Science Process Skills. Assessment in Education, 6(1), 129-144.

Haron, H., Kamaruddin, S. A., Harun, H., Abas, H., & Salim, K. R. (2017). Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Initiatives at Rural Schools and Its Impact on Learning Motivation. Journal of Physics, 1-10.

Hien, T. T. (2009). Why is action research suitable for education? VNU Journal of Science, Foreign Languages, 25, 97-106.

Hine, G. S. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 151-163.

Hine, G. S., & Lavery, S. D. (2014). The importance of action research in teacher education programs: Three testimonies. Transformative, innovative, and engaging. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Teaching Learning Forum. Perth: The University of Western Australia.

Hutapea, A., Bukit, N., & Manurung, S. R. (2021). Improvement of science process skills of high school students through learning models scientific inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-4.

Jones, A. (2012). Technology in Science Education: Context, Contestation, and Connection. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (Vol. 1, pp. 811-822). New York: Springer.

Karpudewan, M., & Meng, C. K. (2017). The Effects of Classroom Learning Environment and Laboratory Learning Environment on The Attitude Towards Learning Science in The 21st-Century Science Lessons. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), Special issue on Graduate Students Research on Education, 25-45.

Karsli, F., & Alipaşa, A. (2014). Developing a Laboratory Activity by Using 5e Learning Model on Student Learning of Factors Affecting the Reaction Rate and Improving Scientific Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 663 – 668.

Kaye, T., & Ehren, M. (2021). Computer-assisted instruction tools: A model to guide users in low- and middle-income countries. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 17(1), 82-99.

Keil, C., Haney, J., & Zoffel, J. (2009). Improvements in Student Achievement and Science Process Skills Using Environmental Health Science Problem-Based Learning Curricula. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(1).

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2020). Laporan Kebangsaan TIMSS 2019 - Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Putrajaya: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2021, April 15). GOOGLE CLASSROOM (GC).

Khairani, Z., Nasution, D., & Bukit, N. (2021). Analysis of Science Process Skills Using Learning Cycle 7E. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-5.

Klofutar, Š., Jerman, J., & Torkar, G. (2020). Direct versus vicarious experiences for developing children’s skills of observation in early science education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 1-18.

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103-122.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019, January 14). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 1-16. doi:

Mei, G. T., Kaling, C., Xinyi, C. S., Sing, J. S., & Khoon, K. N. (2007). Promoting Science Process Skills and The Relevance of Science Through Science Alive! Programme. Proceedings of the Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference. Singapore.

Mitchell, C., Friedrich, L., & Appleget, C. (2019). Preservice teachers’ blogging: collaboration across universities for meaningful technology integration. Teaching Education, 30(4), 356-372.

OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Osborne, J., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Literature Review in Science Education and the Role of ICT: Promise, Problems and Future Directions. Bristol: Futurelab.

Rose, S., Spinks, N., & Canhoto, A. I. (2015). Applying the Principles. Management Research, 1-8.

Seyhan, H. G. (2015). The effects of problem solving applications on the development of science process skills, logical thinking skills and perception on problem solving ability in the science laboratory. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 1.

Smith, P., Rudd, P., & Coghlan, M. (2008). Harnessing Technology: Schools Survey 2008. Becta.

Tan, R. M., Yangco, R. T., & Que, E. N. (2020). Students' Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills in An Inquiry-Based Flipped Classroom Environment. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 159-184.

Temiz, B. K. (2020). Assessing Skills of Identifying Variables and Formulating Hypotheses Using Scenario-Based Multiple-Choice Questions. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(1), 1-17.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A. M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110 – 116.

UNESCO BRESCE. (2008). Academies of Sciences and the Transition to Knowledge Societies. Venice, Italy: UNESCO Regional Bureau for Science and Culture in Europe.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Walan, S., & Gericke, N. (2019). Factors from informal learning contributing to the children’s interest in STEM – experiences from the out-of-school activity called Children’s University. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-22.

Wang, S. (2014). Collaboration Factors and Quality of Learning Experience on Interactive Mobile Assisted Social E-Learning. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 24-34.

How to Cite
Karupaiah, T., & Gnanamalar Sarojini, E. D. (2021). Inter-School Synchronous Peer Collaboration in Enhancing the Science Process Skills of Controlling Variables and Formulating Hypothesis Among Low Achieving Year Five Pupils. Journal of ICT in Education, 8(1), 73-91. Retrieved from