Managing Internet-Based Tutorial Module to Support Statistics Learning Among Postgraduate Students: Learners’ Needs Analysis

Authors

  • Farzaneh Saadati Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA
  • Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA
  • Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA
  • Kamariah Abu Bakar Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Keywords:

ADDIE model, analysis of learners, on-line learning, tutorial module, statistics learning

Abstract

Learning statistics with its mathematical nature is one of the principal stumbling blocks among university students in various faculties. Hence, managing an internet-based tutorial module to support students is value added specifically, when this online tutorial module is well organized in line with learners’ needs and characteristics. Instructional design is defined as a combination of approaches arranged to improve the instructional programs and educational methods. Analysis as the first phase of generic ADDIE model is usually downplayed through instructional design processes. This study focuses on the analysis of target learners concerning characteristics of learning environment and effective strategies for collaborative online learning by reporting and generalizing results from an evaluative single case study. This design was based upon observation and discussion conducted in a face-to-face statistics course and asynchronous communication managed by Facebook -as a discussion forum- to analysis the stakeholders needs and organize an Internet-based tutorial module. The 27 students in this course used this Facebook page daily and engaged in threaded topic discussion within 6 weeks. The central results reported from the analysis phase of ADDIE process, as a crucial element for the success of the whole endeavour of i-TModule development. Actually managing the module properly without these results is not easy or straightforward. The analysis framework presented in this paper could be useful in other similar learning situations especially whose involves online interaction in a conventional face-to-face setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Farzaneh Saadati, Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful, IRAN

Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi, Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Ahmad Fauzi Mohd Ayub, Institute for Mathematical Research (INSPEM), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA

Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, MALAYSIA

References

Adams, R. G., & Granic, A. (2009). Cognitive learning approaches to the design of accessible e-learning systems, Information Science Reference (pp. 209-228), Yurchak Printing Inc., Hershey, New York.

Allen, W. C., & Dobbs, R. (2007). A systematic training model for an evolving workforce. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2007(1) 1396-1403. Chen, I. (2011). Instructional design methodologies. In I. Association (Ed.), Instructional design: Concepts, methodologies, tools and applications, Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, pp. 80-94.

Christensen, C. M., Horn, M. B., & Johnson, C. W. (2011). Disrupting class: How disruptive innovation will change the way the world learns. McGraw-Hill New York. Coetzee, S., & Merwe, P. V. D. (2010). Industrial psychology students’ attitudes towards statistics. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(1), 1-8.

Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making things visible. American Educator: The Professional Journal of the American Federation of Teachers, 15(3), 6-11, 38-46.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser, 487-524.

Cooper, G. (1998). Research into cognitive load theory and instructional design at UNSW. Retrieved October, 22, 2003.

Dempsey, J. V., & Van Eck, R. N. (2002). Instructional design on-line: Evolving expectation. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 281-294) doi:Pearson Education Inc.

Dick, W. (1997). Better instructional design theory: Process improvement or reengineering?. Educational Technology, 37(5), 47-50.

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (Seven Edition ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Columbus, Ohio: Merrill is an imprint of Pearson.

Ellington, H., & Aris, B. (2000). A practical guide to instructional design. Penerbit UTM.

Felder, R. M., & Soloman, B. A. (2000). Learning styles and strategies. At URL: http://www.Engr.Ncsu.Edu/Learningstyles/Ilsweb.Html

Forte, J. A. (1995). Teaching statistics without sadistics. Journal of Social Work Education, 31(2), 204-218.

Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005). Principles of instructional design. Performance Improvement, 44(2), 44-46.

Groeneboom, P., de Jong, P., Tischenko, D. B., & van Zomeren, B. C. (1996). Computer-assisted statistics education at delft university of technology. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 386-399.

Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, (pp 16-25) Merrill Prentice Hall.

Hannafin, H. J., & Hill, J. R. (2002). Epistemology and the design of learning environments. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 70-82) doi:Pearson Education Inc.

Hooper, S., & Reinartz, T. J. (2002). Educational multimedia. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 307-318) doi:Pearson Education Inc.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.Retrieved April, 1, 2004.

Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 215- 239.

Koneru, I. (2010). Addie: Designing web-enabled information literacy instructional modules. Desidoc Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(3), 23-34.

Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60(1), 14-24.

Machado, M., & Tao, E. (2007). Blackboard vs. moodle: Comparing user experience of learning management systems. Frontiers In Education Conference-Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports, 2007. FIE’07. 37th Annual, October (pp. S4J-7). IEEE.

Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., & Ruggeri, K. (2012). Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. European journal of psychology of education, 27(4), 483-498.

Martinez, M., & Jagannathan, S. (2008). Moodle: A Low-Cost Solution for Successful e-Learning. DevLearn, Learning Solutions Magazine, November (10), 1-8.

Mavroudi, A., & Hadzilacos, T. (2013). Learning needs analysis of collaborative e-classes in semi-formal settings: The REVIT example. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5).

Moore, M. G. (1989). Editorial: Three types of interaction, American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-7.

Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(1), 3-19.

Paredes, P., & Rodriguez, P. (2004). A mixed approach to modelling learning styles in adaptive educational hypermedia. Advanced Technology for Learning, 1(4), 210- 215.

Rodriguez, S. (1988). Needs assessment and analysis: Tools for change. Journal of Instructional Development, 11(1), 23-28.

Royse, D., & Rompf, E. L. (1992). Math anxiety: A comparison of social work and non-social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 28(3), 270-277.

Schwen, T. (1973). Learner analysis: Some process and content concerns. AV Communication Review, 21(1), 44-72.

Sosa, G. W., Berger, D. E., Saw, A. T., & Mary, J. C. (2011). Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction in Statistics A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 97-128.

Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions, (2nd. ed.) Ohio: Prentice Hall.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research, SAGE Publications, London.

Tessmer, M. (1990). Environment analysis: A neglected stage of instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 55-64.

Thompson, C. J. (2009). Educational statistics authentic learning CAPSULES: Community action projects for students utilizing leadership and E-based statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 17(1) Wilson, B. (1996). What is a constructivist learning environment? In B. G.

Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 3-10) Educational Technology.

Wilson, G., & Stacey, E. (2004). Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 33- 48.

Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79

Downloads

Published

2015-05-04

How to Cite

Saadati, F., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., Mohd Ayub, A. F., & Abu Bakar, K. (2015). Managing Internet-Based Tutorial Module to Support Statistics Learning Among Postgraduate Students: Learners’ Needs Analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(1), 1–17. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/index.php/JPSMM/article/view/2138

Most read articles by the same author(s)