Model WELD4COMM: Strategi Pembelajaran Berasaskan Perkhidmatan Bagi Pemerkasaan Karakter Pelajar Teknologi Kimpalan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol19.sp.7.2026Keywords:
Weld4Comm Model, Karakter Pelajar, Teknologi Kimpalan , Servis Pembelajaran, Fuzzy Delphi MethodAbstract
Perkembangan Revolusi Industri 4.0 menuntut pelajar aliran vokasional memiliki kemahiran teknikal dan kebolehsuaian kerjaya yang tinggi bagi menghadapi cabaran pasaran kerja masa kini. Namun, instrumen yang menilai kemahiran ini masih terhad dan memerlukan penilaian kebolehpercayaan yang menyeluruh. Sehubungan itu, kajian ini meneliti penyelidikan bertajuk Kebolehpercayaan Instrumen Kemahiran IR4.0 dan Kemahiran Teknikal terhadap Kebolehsuaian Kerjaya Pelajar Sains Rumah Tangga. Tujuan kajian ini adalah menilai kebolehpercayaan instrumen soal selidik yang dibina bagi mengukur tiga konstruk utama, iaitu kemahiran IR4.0, kemahiran teknikal, dan kebolehsuaian kerjaya. Bagi memastikan kesahan kandungan dan kesahan muka instrumen, semakan telah dibuat oleh tiga orang pakar. Penambahbaikan daripada segi struktur ayat, pemilihan istilah, dan kesesuaian item telah dilakukan berdasarkan pandangan mereka bagi memastikan instrumen selaras dengan konstruk yang ingin diukur. Kajian rintis kemudiannya dilaksanakan ke atas 33 pelajar Tingkatan 4 dan 5 dari aliran Sains Rumah Tangga di SMK Dato Haji Kamaruddin, yang turut mengikuti pengajaran berkaitan pembuatan pakaian. Hasil dapatan menunjukkan nilai Alpha Cronbach bagi keseluruhan item ialah 0.987, yang menandakan kebolehpercayaan instrumen berada pada tahap sangat tinggi. Berdasarkan pandangan Tavakol dan Dennick (2011), nilai Alpha Cronbach yang tinggi mencerminkan konsistensi dalaman yang baik dalam mengukur konstruk yang sama. Mereka juga menyatakan bahawa nilai ini dipengaruhi oleh bilangan item serta saiz sampel responden, lebih banyak item yang berkait secara langsung dengan konstruk akan meningkatkan kebarangkalian memperoleh nilai Alpha yang stabil. Justeru, instrumen ini disahkan sah dan sesuai untuk digunakan dalam kajian utama. Kajian ini dijangka dapat menyumbang kepada penambahbaikan kurikulum TVET agar selaras dengan keperluan industri semasa dan cabaran Revolusi Industri 4.0.
Downloads
References
Relevant Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, 1(1), 25–48.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221–239.
Eyler, J., & Giles, D. E. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning? Jossey-Bass.
Hooli, E.-M., Rantala, J., & Jokikokko, K. (2023). The impact of service learning on academic, professional and physical wellbeing competences of EFL teacher education students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4852.
Hsu, H.-H., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8.
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi (KPT). (2023). Dasar Pendidikan TVET Negara 2023 & Pelan Induk TVET Negara 2030.
Keogh, J., Sterling, S., & Vare, P. (2021). Embedding ethical values through experiential and service learning in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(4), 589–608.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Laguador, J. M., & Chavez, N. H. (2020). Employability of engineering graduates through service learning and character formation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 100–109.
Lee, J. S., & Lim, C. (2020). Service learning as a strategy to enhance employability skills: Evidence from vocational education. International Journal of Training Research, 18(3), 225–239.
Lickona, T. (1999). Character education: Seven crucial issues. Action in Teacher Education, 20(4), 77–84.
Mtawa, N. N. (2020). Service-learning as a higher education pedagogy for citizenship and civic agency: A practice-based perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(5), 1031–1045.
Mohd. Ridhuan. M. J., & Nurulrabihah, N. (2020). Kepelbagaian metodologi dalam penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pembangunan. Qaisar Prestige Resources.
Narvaez, D. (2016). Embedding moral character in the curriculum: The essence of moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 45(2), 160–173.
Oakes, J., Rogers, J., & Lipton, M. (2002). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. Teachers College Press.
Pong, H. K., & Lam, P. (2023). The effect of service learning on the development of trait emotional intelligence and adversity quotient in youths: An experimental study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4677.
Prasertcharoensuk, T., & Soisangwarn, A. (2022). Community-based learning for vocational students: Fostering skills and social responsibility. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(1), 112–125.
Razali, S. S., Yusof, N., & Ibrahim, H. (2025). Validation of multimedia elements in TVET using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 38(2), 112–124.
Saedah, S., Norlidah, A., Dorinie, K., & Mohamed Amin, E. (2013). Design and development research: Emergent trends in educational research. Pearson Malaysia.
Saud, M. S. (2021). Pembangunan instrumen karakter kreatif pelajar pendidikan teknikal dan latihan vokasional (TVET). ANP Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 2(2), 112-122.
Sidek, M. N., Hasim, Z., & Zahari, R. (2022). Character-based learning in TVET: A Malaysian context. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 109–125.
Thanh, L. T., & Giang, N. T. (2020). Service learning in Vietnam: A pedagogical approach for student engagement and social development. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(1), 72–79.
UNESCO. (2020). TVET strategy 2020–2025: Transforming technical and vocational education and training for successful and just transitions. UNESCO Publishing.
Wibowo, A., Purwanto, P., & Sukarno, S. (2021). Service learning for vocational education in Indonesia: Building skills and civic values. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(3), 44–57.
Yorio, P. L., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(1), 9–27.
Yu, T., & Chiu, M. S. (2019). Service learning in Asian vocational education: Trends and challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(2), 227–242.
Yusof, N., Ab. Jalil, H., & Saad, N. M. (2017). Application of Fuzzy Delphi Method in validating TVET curriculum elements. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 9(2), 25–35.
Yusof, N., Saad, N. M., & Ab. Jalil, H. (2018). Determining consensus in technical education curriculum using the Fuzzy Delphi Method. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(1), 1–12.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Muqsith Ahmad, Azizul Qayyum Basri, Nor Hidayah Hamdan, Siti Faizzatul Aqmal Mohamad Mohsin, Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil, Mohd Syaubari Othman, Mohd Muslim Md Zalli, Mohamed Nor Azhari Azman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
