The Development of an Interactive Learning Module for Physics Subject in Post-Secondary Institution: A Need Analysis


  • Nurul Syafiqah Yap Abdullah Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia
  • Hazimah Ashamuddin Matriculation Division, Ministry of Education, Malaysia
  • Mazlina Mat Darus Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak, Malaysia



need analysis, interactive module, smartphone, electromagnetism


New approach in teaching and learning (T&L) is essential to sustain the evolvement of knowledge towards a borderless frame. One way to achieve this is by utilizing technology, particularly in T&L with the aim to scaffold the process of knowledge transfer efficiently. In order to adapt to the changes, educators must keep their pace synchronized with the latest innovation in teaching tools, which is common in the field of e-learning. The lack of T & L tools, particularly in learning Physics subjects and the challenges in mastering the concepts are the motivation for a need analysis to be carried out for post-secondary students. This study is crucial to elucidate the actual needs among educators as well as students and to address the choice of topics and preferable methods. The respondent of this study consists of 38 Physics lecturers from eight matriculation colleges under the Ministry of Education, Malaysia, selected through random sampling. A survey form was developed and validated by four experts and data were collected by distributing the survey form randomly. Data were analysed based on the descriptive analysis method. There were four important outcomes regarding the common needs among the educators (1) A swift effort is required to develop an interactive module for T&L using a smartphone; (2) Electromagnetism is the most challenging topic among students; (3) The root cause of the problem arises is due to the inability to visualize the physics concepts; and (4) Simulation, videos, smart apps, and exercises are the aspects that need to be considered in developing the interactive module. Based on these findings, the development of an interactive module for the Electromagnetism topic using smartphone is inevitable with the aim to facilitate the T&L process and enhance students’ understandings.


Download data is not yet available.


Abu NEB, Eu LK. (2017). Hubungan antara sikap, minat, pengajaran guru dan pengaruh rakan sebaya terhadap pencapaian Matematik tingkatan 4. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 2(1), 1-10.

Aji SD, Hudha MN, Huda C, Gufran G. (2018). Computer animation with adobe flash professional Cs6 in Newton’s Law. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 012131.

Alias M, Iksan ZH, Karim AA, Nawawi AMHM, Nawawi SRM. (2020). A novel approach in problem-solving skills using flipped classroom technique. Creative Education.

Alias N, DeWitt D, Siraj S. (2014). An evaluation of gas law webquest based on active learning style in a secondary school in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 175-184.

Astra IM, Fitri UR. (2017). Integrated lecture tools to improve student competencies to develop physical learning media design. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3, 79-88.

Barma S, Daniel S. (2017). Designing enhanced learning environments in Physics: an interdisciplinary collaborative approach producing an instrument for school success in game-based learning across the lifespan. Springer.

Bestiantono DS, Sa’diyah EH, Rachmatya R, Mubarok H, Adam AS, Suprapto N. (2019). University students’ misconception in electromagnetism. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417.

Branch RM. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Cai S, Chiang FK, Sun Y, Lin C, Lee JJ. (2017). Applications of augmented reality-based natural interactive learning in magnetic field instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(6), 778-791.

Cardinot A, Fairfield JA. (2019). Game-based learning to engage students with physics and astronomy using a board game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 9(1), 42-57.

Cepni S, Tas E, Kose S. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted material on students’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Computers & Education, 46, 192-205.

Chou YH, Shyu HY. (2017). Virtual Laboratory of the Magnetic Field due to a Current Element. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from

Clemente G, Jesus F, Martinez E, Wee F, Kang L. (2017). Deployment of physics simulation apps using Easy JavaScript Simulations. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, 1093-1096.

Davis LL. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research.

Gagne RM. (1985). The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Gay LR, Diehl PL. (1992). Research Methods for Business and Management New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.

Halim L, Yong TK, Meerah TSM. (2014). Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions on Forces in Equilibrium: An Action Research Study. Creative Education, 5(11), 1032-1042.

Hookway G, Mehdi Q, Hartley T, Bassey N. (2013). Learning physics through computer games. In Proceedings of GAMES’2013, USA.

Kadir A, Badlilshah MN. (2016). Analisis Sikap Terhadap Pembelajaran Fizik Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Pra Universiti Di Sebuah Kolej Matrikulasi. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

Kalogiannakis M, Ampartzaki M, Papadakis S, Skaraki E. (2018). Teaching natural science concepts to young children with mobile devices and hands-on activities. A case study. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 9(2), 171-183.

Karacop A. (2017). The Effects of Using Jigsaw Method Based on Cooperative Learning Model in the Undergraduate Science Laboratory Practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 420-434.

Kelley TR, Knowles JG. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.

Kumar G, Singh G, Bhatnagar V, Gupta R, Upadhyay SK. (2020). Outcome of online teaching-learning over traditional education during covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(5), 7704-7711.

Li F, Bao Y, Wang D, Wang W, Niu L. (2016). Smartphones for sensing. Science Bulletin, 61(3), 190-201.

Li J, Singh C. (2012). Developing a magnetism conceptual survey and assessing gender differences in student understanding of magnetism. In AIP Conference Proceedings.

Li J, Singh C. (2017). Developing and validating a conceptual survey to assess introductory physics students’ understanding of magnetism. European Journal of Physics, 38 025702.

Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. (2017). Handphone Users Survey. Retrieved from

Mazlan A. (2018). Pembangunan dan penilaian keberkesanan modul pendekatan pengajaran berasaskan otak dengan integrasi I-Think dan Brain Gym untuk meningkatkan kefahaman konseptual dan motivasi belajar Fizik pelajar Matrikulasi. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Mohamad Nasri N, Husnin H, Mahmud SND, Halim L. (2020). Mitigating the Covid-19 pandemic: a snapshot from Malaysia into the coping strategies for pre-service teachers’ education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 546-553.

Morris NP, Lambe J, Ciccone J, Swinnerton B. (2016). Mobile technology: students perceived benefits of apps for learning neuroanatomy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(5), 430-442.

Mueanploy W. (2016). A study: effect of students peer assisted learning on magnetic field achievement. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 710. IOP Publishing.

Muslimin MS, Nordin NM, Mansor AZ. (2017). The design and development of MobiEko: A Mobille Educational App for Microeconomics Module. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Special Issues, 221-255.

Osman K, Halim L, Meerah SM. (2006). What Malaysian Science Teachers Need To Improve Their Science Instruction: A Comparison across Gender, School Location and Area of Specialization. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 2(2), 58-81.

Othman AB, Talib OB, Ibrahim DAB. (2017). Analisis Dokumen Silibus Kimia Organik Matrikulasi Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(3), 1-11.

Papadakis S, Kalogiannakis M. (2017). Mobile educational applications for children: what educators and parents need to know. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 11(3), 256-277.

Phang FA, Abu MS, Ali MB, Salleh S. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran Sains: Satu analisis sorotan tesis. Jurnal Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63-71.

Plotz T, Hopf M. (2016). Students’ misconceptions about invisible radiation. In Electronic Proceedings of the ESERA 2015 Conference, Science Education Research: Engaging learners for a sustainable future. pp. 95–100.

Polit DF, Beck CT. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(5), 489-497.

Potkonjak V, Gardner M, Callaghan V, Mattila P, Guetl C, Petrović VM, Jovanovic K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: a review. Computers and Education, 95, 309-327.

Richey RC, Klein JD. (2014). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. London: Routledge.

Roscoe JT. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioural sciences (2nd Ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Saglam M. (2010). Students’ performance awareness, motivational orientations and learning strategies in a problem-based electromagnetism course. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 11.

Saleh S, Mazlan A. (2019). The effects of brain-based teaching with I-think maps and brain gym approach towards physics understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 12-21.

Singh C. (2005). Student understanding of Symmetry and Gauss’s law. AIP Conf. Proc. 790, 65.

Singh C. (2008). Interactive learning tutorials on quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76(4), 400-405.

Siraj S, Alias N, DeWitt D, Hussin Z. (2013). Design and development research: emergent trends in educational research. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Malaysia.

Wang JY, Wu HK, Hsu YS. (2017). Using mobile applications for learning: Effects of simulation design, visual-motor integration, and spatial ability on high school students’ conceptual understanding. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 103-113.

Yildirim HI, Sensoy O. (2018). Effect of science teaching enriched with technological practices on attitudes of secondary school 7th grade students towards Science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(5), 947-959.

Zajkov O, Gegovska-Zajkova S, Mitrevski B. (2017). Textbook-caused misconceptions, inconsistencies, and experimental safety risks of a Grade-8 Physics textbook. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 837-852.




How to Cite

Abdullah, N. S. Y., Ashamuddin, H., & Mat Darus, M. (2023). The Development of an Interactive Learning Module for Physics Subject in Post-Secondary Institution: A Need Analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 11(1), 83–90.