Exploring Linguistic Predictors of Academic Reading Comprehension Among ESL Undergraduates at a Public University: A Preliminary Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol12.2.8.2024Keywords:
lexical knowledge, Malaysian ESL undergraduates, morphological awareness, reading comprehension, syntactic awarenessAbstract
For many years, ESL educators have placed significant emphasis on improving the reading abilities of primary and secondary education students. Nonetheless, despite these efforts, many university students still encounter difficulties in comprehending academic reading materials. This inadequacy in reading comprehension may be ascribed, at least in part, to the insufficient development of metalinguistic competence, which includes a set of linguistic skills, such as morphology, syntax, and vocabulary. Previous empirical studies have provided compelling evidence of the role of morphological awareness, syntactic awareness, and lexical knowledge in reading comprehension across various age groups such as children and adolescents. Notwithstanding these findings, the precise role and contributions of each determinant remains inconclusive and contradictory, particularly for university students. Hence, this pilot study aimed to validate the adapted instruments used and to bridge the existing scientific lacunae on the linguistic determinants that could predict reading comprehension among Malaysian ESL undergraduates. This study draws upon three prominent theoretical underpinnings: the Reading Systems Framework, the Vocabulary Knowledge-Reading Comprehension Model, and the Automaticity Reading Theory. This study adopted a quantitative approach with a correlational design and recruited ESL undergraduates (n=35) from a public university. Five tests were administered, which included Morphological Awareness Test, Syntactic Awareness Test, Vocabulary Levels Test, Word Associates Test, and Reading Comprehension Test. Data were analysed using statistical techniques, such as descriptive statistics, normality testing, reliability, and Pearson product-moment correlation analysis. The findings revealed significant correlations between all linguistic determinants and reading comprehension, establishing promising groundwork for further large-scale study. This preliminary work not only contributes to the validation of measurement instruments in the Malaysian ESL context but also offers valuable insights into the metalinguistic dimensions of academic reading at the tertiary level so as to address a crucial scientific lacunae in the literature on L2 reading comprehension.
Downloads
References
Ab Manan, N. A., Azizan, N., Fatima, N., & Mohd, W. (2017). Receptive and productive vocabulary level of diploma students from a public university in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 7(1S), 53-59.
Akbulut, F. D. (2017). Effects of morphological awareness on second language vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 10-26.
Al-Jarrah, H., & Ismail, N. S. B. (2018). Reading comprehension difficulties among EFL learners in higher learning institutions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(7), 32-41.
Alavi, S. M., & Akbarian, I. (2012). The role of vocabulary size in predicting performance on TOEFL reading item types. System, 40, 376-385.
Alghail, A. A. A., & Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2016). Academic reading difficulties encountered by international graduate students in a Malaysian university. Issues in Educational Research, 26(3), 369-386.
Amirjalili, F., & Jabbari, A. A. (2018). The impact of morphological instruction on morphological awareness and reading comprehension of EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 10(22), 1-24.
Armstrong, S. L., & Stahl, N. A. (2017). Communication across the silos and borders: The culture of reading in a community college. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 47(2), 99-122.
Aroo, G. (2019). The effect of cognitive strategy instruction on reading comprehension of Malaysian undergraduate ESL students: With a focus on highlighting and taking notes strategies. Sapiens Journal of Modern Education, 1(1), 13-22.
Asgharzade, M., Rahimy, R., & Kalhor, O. P. (2012). The effect of explicit morphological practice on the reading comprehension abilities of Iranian intermediate level English language learners. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1668-1677.
Asraf, R. M., Muhamad, A. J., & Supian, N. (2019). Undergraduate critical thinking and reading of academic texts. Religación: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(15), 74-80.
Atai, M. R., & Nikuinezhad, F. (2012). Vocabulary breadth, depth, and syntactic knowledge: Which one is a stronger predictor of foreign language reading performance? Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 15(1), 1-18.
Azizifar, A. (2011). The relationship between sentence structure awareness and Iranian high school students’ performance in reading comprehension. Korea TESOL, 10(1), 87-101.
Azmuddin, R. A. A., Nor, N. F. M., & Hamat, A. (2020). Facilitating online reading comprehension in enhanced learning environment using digital annotation tools. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 7-27.
Bar-Kochva, I. (2016). An examination of an intervention program designed to enhance reading and spelling through the training of morphological decomposition in word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(2), 163-172.
Bharuthram, S. (2012). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education, 32(2), 205-214.
Bilikozen, N., & Akyel, A. (2014). EFL reading comprehension, individual differences and text difficulty. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 14(2), 263-296.
Binder, K. S., Cote, N. G., Lee, C., Bessette, E., and Vu, H. (2017). Beyond breadth: the contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers. Journal of research in reading, 40(3), 333-343.
Brimo, D., Apel, K., & Fountain, T. (2017). Examining the contributions of syntactic awareness and syntactic knowledge to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 57-74.
Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(4), 679-694.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 169-190.
Chen, K. Y. (2014). Vocabulary, syntactic knowledge and reading comprehension: The perspective of college EFL Students. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 66, 39-52.
Choi, M., & Todaro, J. N. (2022). From considerate to challenging texts: A four‐tiered text approach to thematic reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(6), 457-467.
Daller, M. H., & Xue, H. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and academic success: A study of Chinese students in UK higher education. In B. Richards, M. H. Daller, D. D. Malvern, P. Meara, J. Milton, & J. Treffers-Daller (Eds.), Vocabulary studies in first and second language acquisition (pp. 179-193). Palgrave Macmillan.
Deacon, S. H., & Kieffer, M. (2018). Understanding how syntactic awareness contributes to reading comprehension: Evidence from mediation and longitudinal models. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 72-86.
Desa, G., Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., & Allen, D. D. (2020). Essential but invisible: Collegiate academic reading explored from the faculty perspective. College Teaching, 68(3), 126-137.
Educational Testing Service (ETS) (2021). TOEFL iBT® reading practice questions. Educational Testing Service.
Fen, F. S., Billy, L. S. A., Shing, S. R., & Nadarajan, N. T. M. (2020). Causes of undergraduate students’ reticence in Malaysian ESL classrooms. Selangor Humaniora Review, 4(1), 1-14.
George, D. & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Boston: Pearson.
Gorzycki, M., Howard, P., Allen, D., Desa, G., & Rosegard, E. (2020). An exploration of academic reading proficiency at the university level: A cross-sectional study of 848 undergraduates. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(4), 346-368.
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.
Guo, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Williams, R. S. (2011). The relation of morphological awareness and syntactic awareness to adults’ reading comprehension: Is vocabulary knowledge a mediating variable? Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 159-183.
Heppt, B., Eglinsky, J., Volodina, A., Stanat, P., & Köller, O. (2022). The role of academic language in reading comprehension: Exploring the moderating effects of vocabulary knowledge and reading engagement. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(4), 981-1005.
Hermida, J. (2014). Facilitating deep learning: Pathways to success for university and college teachers. Toronto, Canada: Apple Academic Press.
Holschuh, J.P., & Paulson, E.J. (2013). The terrain of college developmental reading. Oak Creek, WI: College Reading & Learning Association. Retrieved from https://www.crla.net/ images/whitepaper/ TheTerrainofCollege91913.pdf
Horiba, Y. (2012). Word knowledge and its relationship to text comprehension: A comparative study of Chinese- and Korean speaking L2 learners and L1 speakers of Japanese. Modern Language Journal, 96, 108-121.
Howard, P. J., Gorzycki, M., Desa, G., & Allen, D. D. (2018). Academic reading: Comparing students’ and faculty perceptions of its value, practice, and pedagogy. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 48(3), 189-209.
Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160-212.
Jones, E. A. (2001). Working in partnership with faculty to transform undergraduate curricula. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(110), 15-27.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012a). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native English, Spanish, Filipino, and Vietnamese speakers. Language Learning, 62(4), 1170-1204.
Kieffer, M. J., & Lesaux, N. K. (2012b). Knowledge of words, knowledge about words: Dimensions of vocabulary in first and second language learners in sixth grade. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(2), 347-373.
Kolavani, F. H., & Khodareza, M. (2015). Relationship between complex syntax and non-native reading comprehension. Education Journal, 4(6), 356-361.
Kotzer, M., Kirby, J. R., & Heggie, L. (2021). Morphological awareness predicts reading comprehension in adults. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 302-322.
Kung, L. Y., & Aziz, A. A. (2020). An action research on metacognitive reading strategies instruction to improve reading comprehension. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 9(2), 86-94.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293-323.
Lavery, M. R., Acharya, P., Sivo, S. A., & Xu, L. (2017). Number of predictors and multicollinearity: What are their effects on error and bias in regression?. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 48(1), 27-38.
Lee, J. Y. V., & Wong, A. S. C. (2020). Vocabulary Size and Critical Academic Reading Ability of Secondary Students in Sabah. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 26(4), 15-27.
Li, M., and Kirby, J. R. (2014). The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 611-634.
Lin, D. T. A., Pandian, A., & Jaganathan, P. (2018). READ+ vs. READ: Investigating extensive reading and vocabulary knowledge development among Malaysian remedial ESL learners. Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 349-364.
Maag, L. K. (2007). Measuring morphological awareness in adult readers: Implications for vocabulary development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville.
Maftoon, P., & Tasnimi, M. (2014). Syntactic knowledge, vocabulary breadth, and metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in reading comprehension in self-regulated vs. non-self-regulated readers. English Language Teaching, 1(4), 37-61.
Mahony, D. L. (1994). Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability. Reading and Writing, 6(1), 19-44.
Martínez, R. S., Harris, B., & McClain, M. B. (2015). Practices that promote English reading for English learners (ELs). Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 25(2-3), 129-148.
Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129.
Metsala, J. L., Parrila, R., Conrad, N. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2019). Morphological awareness and reading achievement in university students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 743-763.
Miles, J. (2014). Tolerance and Variance Inflation Factor. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mokhtari, K., & Thompson, H. B. (2006). How problems of reading fluency and comprehension are related to difficulties in syntactic awareness skills among fifth graders. Literacy Research and Instruction, 46(1), 73-94.
Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 134-147.
Nambiar, R. M. (2007). Enhancing academic literacy among tertiary learners: A Malaysian experience. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 13, 77-94.
Nassaji, H. (2003). Higher-level and lower level text processing skills in advances ESL reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 87(2), 261-276.
Nath, P. R., Mohamad, M., & Yamat, H. (2017). The effects of movies on the affective filter and English acquisition of low-achieving English learners. Creative Education, 8(08), 1357-1378.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342-56.
Nergis, A. (2013). Exploring the factors that affect reading comprehension of EAP learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 1-9.
Nicol, D. (2007). E‐assessment by design: using multiple‐choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 31(1), 53-64.
Noor, N. M. (2010). ESL learners’ reading approaches of an academic expository text. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 16(2), 19-46.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554-566.
Paiman, N., Yap, N. T., & Chan, M. Y. (2015). Effectiveness of morphemic analysis of Graeco-Latin word parts as a vocabulary learning strategy among ESL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 21(2), 31-45.
Perfetti, C. A., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 22-37.
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227-247). Oxford: Blackwell.
Pey, K. C., Min, L. H., & Wah, L. L. (2014). Relationship between Oral Reading Fluency and Reading Comprehension among ESL Students. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 19-32.
Philips, D. (2001). Longman introductory course for the TOEFL test (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Pretorius, E. J. (2002). Reading ability and academic performance in South Africa: Are we fiddling while Rome is burning? Language Matters, 33(1), 169-196.
Proctor, C. P., Silverman, R. D., Harring, J. R., & Montecillo, C. (2012). The role of vocabulary depth in predicting reading comprehension among English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in elementary school. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(7), 1635-1664.
Qian, D. D. (1998). Depth of vocabulary knowledge: Assessing its role in adults’ reading comprehension in English as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
Qian, D. D., & Schedl, M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21(1), 28-52.
Raeisi‐Vanani, A., & Baleghizadeh, S. (2022). The contributory role of grammar vs. vocabulary in L2 reading: An SEM approach. Foreign Language Annals, 55, 559-585.
Rahmat, N. H., Rahman, S. A. S. A., & Hassan, H. R. (2018). Exploring reading issues among millennials and Genz. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 112-125.
Rashidi. N., & Khosravi, N. (2010). Assessing the role of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 81-108.
Read, J. (1988). Measuring the vocabulary knowledge of second language learners. RELC Journal, 19(2), 12-25.
Rets, I., Astruc, L., Coughlan, T., & Stickler, U. (2022). Approaches to simplifying academic texts in English: English teachers’ views and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 68, 31-46.
Richardson, P. W. (2004). Reading and writing from textbooks in higher education: A case study from Economics. Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 505-521.
Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235-257.
Romly, R., Rahman, S. A., Supie, H. S., & Nasharudin, S. N. (2018). Difficulties encountered by low proficiency ESL students in reading online academic texts. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2), 490-501.
Ronaldi, R., Saleh, R., & Suhartono, L. (2021). Improving EFL students’ reading comprehension through cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies instruction. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(3), 10-19.
Rosenfeld, M., Leung, S., & Oltman, P. K. (2001). The reading, writing, speaking, and listening tasks important for academic success at the undergraduate and graduate levels. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Samuels, S. J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 816-837). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26-43.
Shen, M. Y. (2013). Toward an understanding of technical university EFL learners’ academic reading difficulties, strategies, and needs. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 70-79.
Shen, W., & Park, H. (2018). The effects of meta-cognitive strategies, working memory capacity and syntactic awareness on L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 87-112.
Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24(1), 99-128.
Simpson, I. C., Moreno-Pérez, F. J., Rodríguez-Ortiz, I. D. L. R., Valdés-Coronel, M., & Saldaña, D. (2020). The effects of morphological and syntactic knowledge on reading comprehension in Spanish speaking children. Reading and Writing, 33(2), 329-348.
Singh, C. K. S., Singh, A. K. J., Razak, N. Q. A., & Ravinthar, T. (2017). Grammar errors made by ESL tertiary students in writing. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 16-27.
Singh, M. K. M. (2019). Academic reading and writing challenges among international EFL Master’s students in a Malaysian university: The voice of lecturers. Journal of International Students, 9(4), 972-992.
Stahl, N. A., & King, J. R. (2018). History. In Flippo, R. F., & Caverly, D. C. (Eds.) Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 1–26). New York: Routledge.
Tannenbaum, K., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 70, 381–398.
Taşçı, S., & Turan, Ü. D. (2021a). The contribution of lexical breadth, lexical depth, and syntactic knowledge to L2 reading comprehension across different L2 reading proficiency groups. English Teaching & Learning, 45(2), 145-165.
Taşçı, S., & Turan, Ü. D. (2021b). The contribution of syntactic and lexical knowledge to foreign language reading comprehension. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 97-112.
Tighe, E. L., & Binder, K. S. (2015). An investigation of morphological awareness and processing in adults with low literacy. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(2), 245-273.
Tong, X., & McBride, C. (2017). A reciprocal relationship between syntactic awareness and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 33-44.
Tyler, A. & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649-667.
Tzivinikou, S., Kagkara, D., Fountoukidou, A., & Kakoura, E. (2021). Reading and writing strategies used by typical and struggling readers: A cross-sectional survey. Psychology, 12(5), 692-706.
Vaknin-Nusbaum, V., Sarid, M., Raveh, M., & Nevo, E. (2018). The contribution of morphological awareness to reading comprehension in early stages of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 31(9), 1915-1934.
Vaseghi, R., Gholami, R., & Barjesteh, H. (2012). Critical thinking: An influential factor in developing English reading comprehension performance. Advances in Asian Social Science, 2(1), 401-410.
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2061683.
Wahi, W. (2015). English language literacies of undergraduate students in Malaysia’s culturally and linguistically diverse environment: Casualties of national language policies and globalisation?. Education Research and Perspectives, 42, 329-362.
Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33-69.
Yalin, S., & Wei, T. A. O. (2011). The relative significance of vocabulary breadth and syntactic knowledge in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Quarterly), 34(3), 113-126.
Yunus, K., Mohamad, M., & Waelateh, B. (2016). The breadth of receptive vocabulary knowledge among English major university students. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 1(1), 7-17.
Yusri, S., & Or-Kan, S. (2019). Examining university students’ reading performances and behaviors with the use of eye-trackers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(8), 114-123.
Zhang, D. (2012). Vocabulary and grammar knowledge in second language reading comprehension: A structural equation modeling study. The Modern Language Journal, 96(4), 558-575.
Zhang, D., & Yang, X. (2016). Chinese L2 learners’ depth of vocabulary knowledge and its role in reading comprehension. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 699-715.
Zhang, H., & Zou, W. (2020). Morphological intervention in promoting higher-order reading abilities among college-level second language learners. Sustainability, 12(4), 1465.
Zin, Z. M., Wong, B. E., & Rafik-Galea, S. (2014). Critical reading ability and its relation to L2 proficiency of Malaysian ESL learners. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 20(2), 43-54.
Zipke, M. (2011). First graders receive instruction in homonym detection and meaning articulation: The effect of explicit metalinguistic awareness practice on beginning readers. Reading Psychology, 32(4), 349-371.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Norazha Paiman, Yap Ngee Thai, Chan Mei Yuit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
