Kerangka kajian penerimaaan teknologi permainan sebagai strategi pengajaran abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah subjek sains di Tanjong Malim

The framework of acceptance of game technology study as 21st century teaching strategy among secondary school teachers of science subjects in Tanjong Malim

Authors

  • Mohd Rijalul Aini Arba’Ain Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
  • Maizatul Hayati Mohamad Yatim Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.sp.1.10.2022

Keywords:

Model Penerimaan Teknologi, teknologi permainan, subjek sains, teknologi terhadap guru, pendidikan

Abstract

Kajian yang akan dijalankan ini adalah untuk mengukur tahap penerimaan teknologi permainan dan pencapaian akademik pelajar sekolah menengah yang terdapat di Tanjong Malim. Dalam kajian ini, Model Penerimaan Teknologi (TAM) akan digunakan untuk menguji tahap penerimaan teknologi permainan oleh guru-guru. Kajian ini melibatkan beberapa pemboleh ubah bersandar dan pemboleh ubah tidak bersandar. Kajian kuantitatif ini yang akan melibatkan 15 orang guru dan pelajar yang terlibat dengan subjek sains di tiga buah sekolah menengah di Tanjong Malim. Dalam kajian ini, kajian korelasi digunakan untuk menilai hubungan antara pemboleh ubah yang dikaji. Analisis kajian juga akan dibuat untuk mengkaji penerimaan teknologi terhadap guru-guru dan kesan terhadap pelajar.

Abstract

This study was conducted to measure the level of acceptance of game technology and academic achievement of secondary school students in Tanjong Malim. In this study, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) will be used to test the level of game technology acceptance by teachers. This study involved several dependent variables and independent variables. This quantitative study will involve 15 teachers and students involved with science subjects in three secondary schools in Tanjong Malim. In this study, a correlation study was used to assess the relationship between the variables studied. Research analysis will also be made to examine the acceptance of technology on teachers and its impact on students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036

Ahmad, A., & Jinggan, N. (2017). Pengaruh kompetensi kemahiran guru dalam pengajaran terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar dalam mata pelajaran Sejarah. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 3(2), 1-11.

Adamu, Muhammad Sadi and Benachour, Phillip (2020) Analysing the Integration of Models of Technology Diffusion and

Acceptance in Nigerian Higher Education. Dalam: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. SciTePress, pp. 178-187. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009572101780187

Barker, T. & Beng, L.Y. (2017). Making creative industries policy: The Malaysian case. Kajian Malaysia 35(2): 21–37.

https://doi.org/10.21315/km2017.35.2.2

Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Trends in digital game-based learning in the mobile era: A systematic review of journal

publications from 2007 to 2016. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 13(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2019.096468

Dellos, R. (2015). Kahoot! A digital game resource for learning. International Journal of Instructional technology and distance

learning, 12(4), 49-52.

Foster, A., & Shah, M. (2020). Principles for advancing game-based learning in teacher education. Journal of

Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 36(2), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1695553

Halili, S. H., & Razak, R. A. (2021). Persepsi guru bahasa tamil terhadap penerimaan program pembelajaran flip. JuKu: Jurnal

Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 9(2), 12-17.

Huizenga, J. C., Ten Dam, G. T. M., Voogt, J. M., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Teacher perceptions of the value of game-based

learning in secondary education. Computers & Education, 110, 105-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.03.008

Iberahim, A. R., Mahamod, Z., & Mohammad, W. M. R. W. (2017). Pembelajaran abad ke-21 dan pengaruhnya terhadap sikap,

motivasi dan pencapaian bahasa melayu pelajar sekolah menengah Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu, 7(2), 77-88.

Isa, R. F. M. (2019). Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET): Tempat Asas Pembinaan Budaya Keselamatan di Malaysia. Journal of Vocational Education Studies, 2(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.12928/joves.v2i2.1205.

Karhulahti, V. M. (2015). Defining the videogame. Game studies, 15(2). http://gamestudies.org/1502/articles/karhulahti

Kamil, A. (2015). Industri kreatif Indonesia: Pendekatan analisis kinerja industri. Media Trend, 10(2),207-225. https://doi.org/10.21107/mediatrend.v10i2.946

Nuroh, E. Z. (2016). Pendekatan Holistik dan Kolaboratif dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris di Sekolah Dasar. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 311-322. https://doi.org/10.21070 /pedagogia. v5i2.264

Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational psychologist, 50(4), 258-

https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533

Saputra, S. Y. (2017). Permainan tradisional vs permainan modern dalam penanaman nilai karakter di sekolah dasar. ELSE

(Elementary School Education Journal): Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 1(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30651/else.v1i1.873

Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960-

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137

Downloads

Published

2022-12-01

How to Cite

Arba’Ain, M. R. A., & Yatim, M. H. M. (2022). Kerangka kajian penerimaaan teknologi permainan sebagai strategi pengajaran abad ke-21 dalam kalangan guru sekolah menengah subjek sains di Tanjong Malim: The framework of acceptance of game technology study as 21st century teaching strategy among secondary school teachers of science subjects in Tanjong Malim. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(3), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.sp.1.10.2022